Many years ago when my son about 6 or so years old I watched with amusement as he "cleaned" his room. He brought stuff out to the living room couch for sorting. Of particular interest were two piles of papers, one entitled "information," while the second was identified as "informational information." I asked for clarification and, while I cannot remember what my precocious offspring said verbatim, his argument as to what constituted "informational information" made perfect sense not only to him, but to me as well. This situation is what pops into my head every time Darrell Brooks says, "lawful law." Unfortunately, my son's intuition at 6 years old was far more sophisticated than Mr. Brooks' seems to have ever been.
I do not find his "alleged" crimes to be at all amusing but my brain is wired to find humor even in horrifying situations. As such, I can see my son's thoughtful face as he defines the difference between regular information and "informational" information. And his arguments make a whole lot more sense than Mr. Brooks'. I cannot help but compare Darrell's machinations to stave off prison to the way my son avoided actually cleaning his room. As my son grew up to participate in high school marching band, the situation hits home. Luckily, he managed to escape into young adult hood without being mowed down during a holiday parade. That prospect wasn't even on my radar when I proudly watched from the sidewalk. Sadly, band parents today no longer have that option. No parade anywhere will be watched without this terrible situation coming to mind. We've all lost, now Mr. Brooks must lose, IMO.