The other day while I was doing research for my last video I stumbled onto something a tiny bit interesting. It was a Change.org petition entitled, "Stop The False Allegations & Targeted Harassment Against Popcorned Planet’s Andy Signore!" from a year ago. In one incredibly long, incredibly hyperbolic paragraph, he whines about how "Amber Heard bots" are making "false accusations" against him. About how he's been through this before back in like 2018 and he doesn't appreciate his name being anywhere near to Harvey Weinsten's. About all his achievements, blah blah blah.
What I find most interesting (beside the fact that it doesn't even have 500 signatures) is his use of the word "consensual" which is what he used for proof regarding one woman's allegation against him. He did a whole video on it and dismissed the other 8 women's claims as "awkward flirting." It dawned on me that he pretty much claims that a woman in a "relationship" cannot be raped. We all know that's a fallacy, right? Consent can be revoked at any time for any reason. I am not saying that Andy committed a felony, I'm simply pointing out that his arguement is specious.
Spe·cious
adjective
superficially plausible, but actually wrong.Definitions from Oxford Languages
He pulled the same card regarding my good friend, Britt, when she came forward earlier this year, which involves a whole new set of allegations with a new set of women. (contrary to what Andy tries to make folks believe). While the idea that she actually gave any sort of consent in the first place is debatable, she definitely removed it before he started sending her inappropriate videos.
In doing further research on the concept of "exhibitionism," which seems to be Andy's kink, I discovered this article from the Independent entitled, "Why do male sexual abusers force women to watch them masturbate?" Because what Andy does is foist these types of videos onto unsuspecting women. I know of two for sure, so far, but it's doubtful he restricted himself to just them.
But the person who does this in a more targeted, personal way - rather than anonymously - is doing so to feel powerful and aroused at the same time. When someone like Louis C.K. [or Andy Signore] exposes himself, the psychological torture is also part of the arousal. “This kind of exhibitionism is also rooted in deep sexual inadequacy,” she says, adding that perpetrators might think to themselves: I'm not good enough. Nobody would want me. Or: I'm sexually ashamed of myself, so I've got to go take what I want.
“It's a hair's breadth away from rape,” Katehakis says. “It's what we call a non-contact offence, but it's an offence.”
This is both interesting and horrifying. While Andy has copped to a sex addiction there is little evidence he sought treatment 5 or so years ago. Or if he did, it didn't do any good. And there may be a reason for that:
Vigorito cautions that treatment for sex addiction (which conflates consensual and non-consensual sex) is not the same as treatment for sexual offences (which are always non-consensual).
“People would rather say: 'I'm a sex addict' and go into addiction rehab than say: 'I'm engaged in non-consensual sex' and go see someone who has experience in working with sex offenders,” Vigorito says. But “that's where they need to go.”
THIS is the shocking and sad reality of Andy Signore. IMO, allegedly. Video out now: