SimplyBel
Writing
The Sham Trial of Karen Read
We're all in on the joke, right?
May 12, 2024
post photo preview

In January of 2022, Boston police officer John O'Keefe was found unresponsive on the front lawn of Boston Police officer Brian Albert's front lawn at 34 Fairview in Canton, MA. Officer O'Keefe's girlfriend, Karen Reed, was one of the people who found him. Later, she was charged with manslaughter when it was discovered that she was the one to drop him off in front of the Albert house in the wee hours of Jan 29th. It is alleged that she backed into him as she was leaving. That they were on the verge of a break up so she got angry and mowed him down. And was so drunk after a night out on the town that she only vaguely remembered what she did. The latter was due to hysterical ramblings she made the morning of, while she was in shock. They allegedly include "is he alive," "is he dead," and the all important, "I hit him."

Things get interesting when we discover that the local Canton police thought using a leaf blower, red solo cups and a shopping bag in their "investigation" were stellar ideas. Well, things actually got interesting well before that when the FBI decided to investigate the investigation, but that's not yet come out in trial. At least, I don't think it has - the prosecutor, Adam Lally, makes my brain go numb on the daily. We're 10 days into this trial and the only thing that's been proven is that it snowed, bars have low top and hight top tables, both Karen and John were lovely people in love, and the Canton PD are the modern day version of the Keystone Cops. Oh, and Officer O'Keefe seems to be the only law enforcement officer in Canton that has security cameras.

First we heard from the first responders who either didn't write a report or wrote one that didn't match the testimony they gave. Sucks for them that many of them testified at both a state and federal grand jury so there's a lot to use to impeach them because their stories seem to have "evolved." Not a single one actually immortalized the words "I hit him," in anything approaching an official document. Not ONE. And her supposedly saying these words is what many on the Karen Read is guilty train are hanging their hats on. Other incriminating "evidence" of her guilt is her "resting bitch face" (aka RBF) and some nasty texts/voicemails she left that night 'cuz she was mad that John wasn't responding to her calls. If these "facts" are all it takes to lock someone up, someone should come and cuff me. I've taken blame for things that weren't my fault (damn that Catholic guilt), I absolutely have an RBF 'cuz I frown when I think (which is almost always) and in my day I've left some hella voice mails for hubby when he's being an absolute butthead.

We were shown "crime scene" pics that looked like they were taken with a Polaroid instamatic camera circa 1975. There was nary a little yellow numbered marker, nor were there any measuring instruments. The picture of where Officer O'Keefe had lain on the snow was identified as being "true and accurate" when it was just a crappy photo of snow that could've been taken by my 8 year old sister during the blizzard of 1978 here in Michigan. Even after seeing those pics over and over for the first 5 days, I cannot remember if it was a pre-leaf blower pic or not. Maybe they documented the before and after? Who knows. But what we do know is that the initial "investigation" of that lawn took maybe an hour before they released it wherein they did not find Officer O'Keefe's second shoe (he was found wearing only one) nor his baseball cap. 

I feel bad that I keep forgetting that the commonwealth's (CW) first two witnesses were the victim's brother and sister-in-law. They both liked Karen back then, they went to Aruba at the same time Karen & John did (approximately between Xmas and New Year 2022) although not together, they were on opposite sides of the tiny island, and both knew that the couple had gotten into an argument because John supposedly hugged and/or kissed another woman. This is known as the "Aruba incident" and the CW has a few people from that trip as well as John's neice and nephew that he was the guardian of on their list of witnesses to attest to this kerfluffle. I honestly do not think the children should be put on the stand, they've had enough trauma to last them their whole lifetimes. John was their guardian because they'd lost both of their parents and now they've lost John. 

We heard from a few of Officer O'Keefe's friends that were at one or the other of the two bars John and Karen visited on that fateful evening before his death. We learned that they liked Bud Light (except Karen, she had a tall glass with clear liquid and a lime slice that she liked so much she allegedly took it to the second bar with her), that the couple was "lovey dovey" and Karen did not appeared intoxicated. And they all held both in a very high regard. Both bars had CCTV although the first is much higher quality than the second, and backed up what they testified to. The one bar receipt we've seen showed that John bought 2 beers and a Titos (vodka). I guess that's what was in the glass that Karen seems to have nursed all night long.

The last few days saw a parade of the Albert family, some of whom lived at 34 Fairview road on who's lawn John was found. All of whom were at the second bar with the couple. Two of whom saw Karen smuggle her favorite glass in under her coat. None of which saw her drunk nor saw the couple being affectionate. With these witnesses, the DA Adam Lally seemed to be more concerned with proving them innocent rather than Karen Reed guilty. To date, there's been very little evidence of how Officer O'Keefe was killed, much less who done it. So, what else have we learned so far from these Alberts?

  • Chris Albert, brother of homeowner Brian Albert, owns a pizza joint that supports him and his whole family that has been in business for 25 years. He is a "recently" (2022) elected selectman of Canton but has no idea what the job entails. He was on a diet so couldn't eat pizza but potato skins and chicken fingers, as well as Miller Lite, are allowed. He walked from his place of employment to the second bar, then walked home. Without a coat during a blizzard warning. He was the last one to leave the bar at 12:13 am. where he hustled home, stripped and jumped into bed in time to be awoken by his son, Collin, telling them he was home and wishing them a good night. At like 12:15 am.
  • Julie Albert, wife of Chris and mother to Collin and his younger brother, is a gum chewer. Although Chris said she brought him clothes to change into before the bar, she seems to have forgotten that fact. She left early from that second bar due to a "migraine." She was still awake when Chris dove into bed, until their son arrived home and came into the bedroom to inquire about her health and give her a kiss goodnight. This sweet boy has a pic of him and his parents giving the camera middle fingers and of bruised knuckles in Feb of 2022, but these are not facts in evidence, unfortunately. She also has a "ritual" (did they mean "tradition?") of buying her nephew Dunkin Donuts for his birthday and leaving them in his car. Which she tried to do the morning of Jan 29 at approximately 8 am but was called into the house, against her wishes. Somewhere in there she either woke up her husband and told him about the sad situation or he woke up on his own and then she told him. Whichever did not deter her from her Dunkin run, though.

  • Nichole Albert, wife of homeowner Brian Albert, is a lunch lady. Together they have several children, one of whom, Brian Albert Jr., was celebrating his birthday with a gathering of friends at home that night. Her drink of choice is White Claw, one of which she took with her when she left. Upon arriving home, she literally bumped into her nephew Colin as he was supposedly being picked up by some unnamed person. She then proceeded to tidy up, as one does after midnight and an evening at the bar. There were other unnamed young people who played some music on a small speaker. Everybody seemed to be polite and well behaved. Even their dog, a german shepherd (maybe mix, according to hubby Brian) whose doggy door consisted of a regular door and a storm door. No, it doesn't make sense. And Adam Lally is never helpful in clearing things up. Her daughter, Caitlin, was the last to leave the home at 34 Fairview at 2 am being picked up by her boyfriend, Tristan, who was at the bar but ran home to nap so he could plow snow later. Nichole also likes to refer to the dog as "it" and did not get rid of Chloe but rehomed "it" to some unknown place in Vermont because Chloe liked to bite people. She swears she told the CW where the dog currently lives but, for whatever reason, the CW pretended it had no idea where the dog was.

  • Brian Albert, homeowner and Boston police officer who appeared in some reality TV show about, you guessed it, Boston cops. Although his wife is completely unaware that her husband knows how to fight, he seems to do it a lot on the aforementioned TV show. Brian attended a NYPD officer's funeral that day, then drove home in order to go to two different bars (the first one was not where John & Karen were but the second was). We witnessed bar footage of him play fighting with ATF agent Brian Higgins who followed him home that night. After Albert relieved himself, he took the dog out so she could relieve herself even though she had a doggy door according to his wife. That may or may not have been a regular door. Yes, it's confusing. This whole case is confusing. Anyway, he escorted his wife upstairs (maybe with/for the dog??) but got into bed before her. They both agree she was the last to go to bed where they slept soundly until Nichole's sister, Jen McCabe, "burst" into their room somewhere between 6 & 6:30 in hysterics (that were not at all displayed during her 911 call nor on any dash cams that fateful morning). The Alberts had no idea there were emergency units with lights flashing, and Karen Read screaming in actual hysterics, in front of their house. I guess a train might've been pasing by? And/or the blinds and drapes on their windows were incredibly insulating, so much so that Chloe the dog also appeared completely unaware and didn't make a sound. We've not yet gotten to cross examination on Brian but I SO hope defence attorney Alan Jackson asks about that!

I've never watched a trial where the prosecution has been so yawn inducing that I really REALLY look forward to cross. I've also never encountered one that was so divided since Depp v Heard. And never a criminal case that was. The two factions identify as #Justice for John O'Keefe and #Free Karen Read. However, in my eyes, the two are not mutually exclusive. So far, there's been absolutely no credible evidence to show Karen Read guilty. Especially not with the last four witnesses where prosecution seems to be playing defence for them. The state of Massachusetts not only has the reasonable doubt standard but also the caveat of "to a moral certitude." Between the tweedle dummies of Canton PD who plopped a grocery bag of solo cups with red blood droplets into the sallie port behind Karen's towed SUV to the lead investigator MA state trooper Micheal Proctor's unauthorized search of Karen's phone for nude photos, morals seem to be in short supply, IMO. Those firmly entrenched in Karen's guilt misplace blame for what Officer John O'Keefe's family has endured these past 2 plus years. They also seem to ignore the fact that the CW and the judge refuse to use the title of "officer" when identifying the deceased. However, the defence always gives him his honorific. So, just who is actually seeking "justice?"

If you like what I have to say consider following and/or tipping me – https://linktr.ee/BeingBel. Tips will go toward groceries and bills. I just want to contribute to our household at this time. Thanks so much!

community logo
Join the SimplyBel Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
August 18, 2023
Andy Signore is striking YT channels that shared his parody video

The cover is a still from the original video, the second is part of that parody that was created. Note that NEITHER show ANY nudity WHATSOEVER. He doesn't want the general public to know what a perverted scum bag he is. This week started off with a bang when he popped in Saggy Melonz live stream on Sat Aug 12. Andy Signore is triggered and running scared, IMO!

00:00:23
August 26, 2023
Chronicles of Andy Signore

Just storing this here since Andy Signore is striking google docs...

Chronicles_of_Andy_Signore_(3).pdf
Funerals are for the living.

Today is an odd day. It's been a decade/15 years since I lost my own parents and we didn't have traditional burial rights for either of them. It's been quite awhile since I took part in a Catholic funeral mass, which will be tomorrow for my father-in-law. Today is the interminable visitation although I highly doubt we'll be there for the entire 7 hours. Or at least, I hope not.

When I go, just cremate me and sprinkle me in the ocean to swim with dolphins. Or in Lake Superior just 'cuz I think it's cool. Have a party if you're so inclined and play some Pat Benatar, a little Enya, some Neil Diamond. Classic 70's rock and 80's pop. Maybe plant a tree.

Funerals are for the living even though we like to claim they're for the dead. Well, honoring the dead, anyway. The pomp and circumstance can be soothing to some, and others view it as an obligation. I fall in neither category and, more importantly, neither do my husband & son. However, these are the wishes of my step mother-in-law so we will...

November 05, 2024
Truth about Britt

Deleted post from Sept 2023

truth_about_britt_updated.pdf
November 06, 2025
post photo preview
The Many Faces of Lauren Matthias
When "true crime" becomes "true whine."

The social media streets are filled with ponderings regarding a certain 9 hour live-stream on YouTube (YT). Lauren Matthias, former local network reporter, now co-host of Hidden True Crime (HTC) (along with her husband, Dr. John Matthias) sat in front of a camera for 9 hours to tell everybody that would listen that she had a stalker and was afraid for her safety. What followed was not quite what I expected. It doesn't look like it's what many expected as she seems to have as many detractors as she does supporters. 

I'll admit, I was a "Hidden Gem" for a time, mostly for the Vallow Daybell trials. I dropped both my membership and subscription due to Lauren's takes regarding Richard Allen and his trial in Delphi, IN. Even Dr. John highly disappointed me, not seeing any problem at all with a presumed innocent pre-trial detainee being subjected to over a year in solitary confinement in the Indiana prison system (IDOC). Or him seemingly A-OK with a psych professional, Dr. Wala, being in every Facebook (FB) regarding the Delphi murders while treating this alleged murderer - is she just a true crime junkie or did she want to help insure his conviction?  Personally, I believe Rick Allen has been treated terribly and is factually innocent in the deaths of Abigail Williams & Liberty German.

Picking up bad habits from some friends that she made during that trial (mainly the co-hosts of Murder Sheet), Lauren copyright struck a number of smaller YT creators when they used her footage under Fair Use. In other words, they provided commentary (which was probably negative) regarding her reporting. I know at least one YouTuber settled things with her, one who also covered the Vallow Daybell trials, but the rest I'm unsure of.

To be fair, I did not listen to Lauren's whole 9 hour livestream. I've watched it piecemeal via other creators. I also listened to her court hearing and read some of documents Sleuthie Goosie posted on X. Mostly the affidavits of Christina (aka The Stalker) and three of her friends to see what the other side had to say. Lauren and her defenders claim they were followed a good half-dozen times but it seems Lauren and her crew purposely placed themselves in the vicinity. A few took place at/around CrimeCon 2025 - Christina had purchased a VIP pass a year prior which Lauren not only knew about, as they were friendly at the time, she had no plans to attend herself. Lauren had no booth, was not a speaker, etc. yet she showed up anyway and managed to prevent Christina from attending because she had a temporary restraining order (TRO) (or whatever the hell it's called in Utah/Nevada). Lauren also claims she was there "for work." What "work?"

A few other physical encounters that allegedly took place happened when Christina was out of the country. I guess the reason she was chosen as "The Stalker" is due to a bunch of harmless (and kinda inane IMO) Tik Tok videos. For 4 years, a rather large YT creator (he's approaching 1M subs, might have even surpassed it, but I very rarely watch him) and his co-creators/friends love to mention me and my friends, calling us things like crazy psycho mean girls that he will one day sue. Like Christina, he's careful not to mention our names. When we hit back, we endure ridicule and worse. That's just how social media works and Lauren is not exempt. She's also not being stalked, IMO.

As a matter of fact, that TRO will never become a permanent one. They held the first half of the hearing where the judge warned Lauren that she was trampling all over Christina's 1st amendment rights. Then we heard from a couple of witnesses on Christina's side. It was at the end of the day so they scheduled the remainder of the hearing for sometime in the future. Lauren's lawyer(s) subsequently asked for more time which the judge denied. In the end, Lauren dropped the matter although she's not told her followers that. Actually, reading the court docs, Lauren left out or twisted quite a bit of the story and made some ant hills into mountain ranges, IMO.

Bottom line: As Emily D. Baker says, "the internet is gonna internet." If you don't like what someone has to say then don't read/watch them. You can generally mute/block people on the various social media platforms. If you say shitty things in texts/DMs just know that eventually they're gonna get out. When it comes back to bite you in the ass it's best to swallow your pride and apologize rather than trying to villainize critics, IMO.

For a balanced perspective, I suggest watching Chasing's videos - she breaks everything down sensibly. I also highly recommend reading the court docs posted by Sleuthie Goosie.

Read full Article
August 20, 2025
post photo preview
Which are the Good Faith Actors?

While I was on my latest social media hiatus journalist Jess Machado posted her first interview on her new YouTube (YT) channel. Who did she choose as her subject? Notorious anti-free Karen Read (AFKR) figure, Kate Peter (KP) (or  "Krusty Panties" as fellow journalist Aidan Kearny has dubbed her). I have not watched the interview nor do I intend to - why would I subject myself to a known liar lying? Jess had to know that FKR would have feelings about this particular choice, that many of her "besties" would experience shock and disappointment. Unless KP came clean about her true reason for her AFKR stance and how it really was all about her hatred of Aidan. Dang it, now I just might hafta take a peek.

However, from what I'm seeing on X, it seems people are upset with Jess for publicly airing grievances with LTL media, a YT channel she appeared on weekly during the second trial of Karen Read. Particularly about a video that may or may not exist regarding the death of Mass. State Trooper trainee Enrique Delgado Garcia. This is a story that Brian of LTL has had his teeth sunk into since the end of last year, 2024. Garcia purportedly died of a brain aneurism during a training exercise although I'm wondering if that happened before or after his neck was broken (amongst other injuries). Hell of a coincidence, right?

Apparently, Brian gave Jess a glimpse of said video and claims she could've asked him to play it if she wanted to see the whole thing. Jess wonders why he hasn't shared it with the world. Brian has also said he does not actually possess it but has seen it. Logic dictates to me that Jess is the one telling the truth. And I think she's probably been pushing him to do something constructive with it. How much more could a paid guest do? Yes, that's the other thing that has stuck in the craw of many: Jess required payment to appear on Brian's show - an arrangement that both seemed comfortable with. This may well be standard in the TV industry but it strikes an odd chord with those of us who consume our news via social media.

Now I'm gonna rewind my way back to the reason for my hiatus - the downfall of someone we saw as a staunch supporter of Karen Read, Estey, and the rise of a pain in the ass named John Baron who seemed particularly aggrieved by another staunch FKR, Nan AKA Lawferio. I don't believe the two are connected, they just happened around the same time. It seems Estey just likes to sucker fish to large trials, her last one being another that is near and dear to my heart: Johnny Depp v Amber Heard (I'm JD all the way, BTW). As for John Baron, it turns out that it was an account shared by AFKR and FKR personalities. I have no idea why they picked on Nan. Jealousy and/or boredom are the only things that spring to mind. It's the height of stupidity to defame a successful lawyer, IMO.

Just for funsies, let's wrap all of this up and tie it with a ribbon called, "I was disappointed in Karen Read's party & other disgruntlements." LTL/Brian said he just sat back and observed the party because that's just how he is, now he's upset about not being included more. Or maybe it's more about not getting the recognition he thought he'd earned which is what Rita Lombardi's and Sean on the Gulf's complaints were about, too. Personally, what I do is because I feel it's right, not because I want kudos. I mean, they're nice, don't get me wrong, but they're not my reason d'etre. I'm about the same age as Rita & Sean - we're of an age that we're supposed to have some wisdom. Aparently that's about as rare as common sense.

In the end, I guess it comes down to what I'm willing to tolerate. I'm all for good fun but not when it comes at the expense of others. I guess I'm simply not up for schadenfreude.

Schadenfreude refers to the joy you might feel at another person’s pain. It’s a compound of the German nouns Schaden, meaning “damage,” and Freude, meaning “joy.”  Merriam-Webster

Read full Article
post photo preview
Jennifer Coffindaffer is Tired, Poor Thing!
The sham trial of Karen Read

Former (supposed) FBI agent Jennifer Coffindaffer says some ridiculous things on X regarding the Karen Read trial (amongst others). This one caught my eye yesterday:

Let's break it down:

The Top Ten Reasons why I can't Wait for the Karen Read trial to be over:

1-Tired of all the dissent in the True Crime Community. 

Most of those in the "True Crime Community" realize that, at the very least, the investigation was sorely lacking thus engendering feelings of a whole shit ton of reasonable doubt. People who truly believe Karen Read is guilty should be mad as hell at disgraced former trooper Michael Proctor yet they're not. I find this incredibly odd. It's almost like they agree with his whole "pin it on the girl" strategy.

2-Tired of trying to explain that there is 0 proof that an ATF Agent (who has his job and was not reprimanded in anyway much less accused of murder), a 30+ year Boston Police Officer (featured on Boston's Finest and retired with distinction about 2 years After the crime), a dog (sent to Vermont months after the crime due to a fight she had with another dog), and a minor (not even worth mentioning) Murdered John O'Keefe and brilliantly threw him in their front lawn.

So, stop trying to excuse ... er, explain stuff regarding people you don't even know. Higgins is on desk duty (last we heard, anyway), Brian Albert has a history of beating people up, a dog whose owners called the poor girl "it" and made her disappear the night of the incident only for her to reappear then end up being "rehomed," and a thug in the making. Btw, it's curious that you, of all people, knew where Chloe supposedly was when even the defense team didn't. The rest of us learned during her "mom" Nichole Albert's testimony well into trial #1. Another oddity, IMO.

3- Tired of listening to Alessi. 

I'm so sorry that Alessi is too smart and well spoken for some to understand. Personally, I'm tired of Hank Brennan's incessant whining. 

4- Tired of watching Karen Read's courtroom antics. 

No idea what you're talking about here. Do you mean her being an active and valued member of her own defense team?

5- Tired of reading all of the dribble from those who haven't watched the trial but pretend they have.

I think the word you're looking for is "drivel" and those who rebut you probably *have* watched the trial, you just don't like their viewpoints. Many also probably watched some, if not all, pretrial (especially for this second trial). I certainly have. The CW's own ME said Ofc O'Keefe's injuries were inconsistent with a motor vehicle strike. What are we even doing here?

6- Tired of the podcasters flushing truth for viewership.

Same girl, same but opposite. I'm tired of those that have flushed their integrity in order to push the CW's false narrative. However, I'm glad to weed out those who apparently lack critical thinking skills.

7- Tired of the Blogger's filthy mouth and lies. 

So don't watch/listen to him or read his articles. Easy fix, right?

8- Tired of Watching the Fan.

Agreed.

9- Tired of a simple Occam's Razor Domestic Violence case being made into a Cecil B. Deville drama fest.

I'm tired of people who think that cops running a crappy investigation is A-OK as long as whoever they deem to be the "bad guy" gets put away. I'm also tired of people shitting on our US Constitution and using the Bill of Rights to wipe their ass.

And number 10: Tired of watching a spoiled one continue to mock the death of a wonderful soul named John O'Keefe.

Nobody finds humor in the death of OFFICER John O'Keefe. Many see the tragedy in that some of his fellow brothers in blue didn't give him the honor he was due by conducting a proper investigation, exploring all avenues, in order to figure out what truly happened to him. Instead, he was just "a man," "the guy," and, ultimately, the victim. He's not even referred to as a Boston Police Officer in much of the CW's case. 

I will continue to advocate for justice in this case because it's the right thing to do.

Justice means not trampling over someone's rights. It means recognizing shoddy police work. It means not rushing to judgement. It means a thorough and proper investigation. It means not resorting to trickery in an attempt to secure a conviction. It means not ignoring inconvenient truths. 

This trial has brought to light how some DA's offices along with their local law enforcement sometimes works to railroad innocnt people. As attorney Mark Bederow likes to say, they're supposed to be the good guys. With Karen Read, we're seeing that's not always the case which is pretty eye opening, IMO. I have learned to take a closer look at how cases are investigated and garnered even more appreciation for the role of defense attorneys. Like many others, I've come to understand that the government does not generally have our best interest in mind. Sometimes they need their feet held to the fire. We can learn much from criminal defense attorneys Bob & Ali Motta (Defense Diaries), Andrea Burkhart (Andrea Burkhart), Ian Runkle (Runkle of the Bailey) and Natalie Whittingham Burrell (natalielawyerchick) as well as former prosecutor Emily D. Baker (The Emily Show). I would be remiss if I did not mention Attorney Melanie Little for complete covereage since pre-trial 1 and Peter Tragos (Lawyer You Know) for his unbiased and nuanced coverage. These are just a handful of lawyers on social media that are covering and/or commenting on this case. Those worth following point out the myriad of issues and just how much reasonable doubt there is.

FREE KAREN READ

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals