SimplyBel
Writing
The sham trial of Karen Read part 2
Evidence? Evidence?
May 20, 2024
post photo preview

Day 14 of Commonwealth v Karen Read concluded yesterday and we still have no idea how Officer John O'Keefe was killed. Or even that he actually was murdered. No lead investigator to walk us through all the steps of said investigation. No medical examiner to describe his injuries and tell us the cause and manner of death. No autormobile expert to decipher black box and/or infotainment data. We did hear from a women that works in the small forensics department of UC Davis school of veterinary medicine who conducted an examination of two swabs taken from O'Keefe's clothing. She concluded that, while no dog DNA was discovered, pig DNA was. This witness had to testify out of order due to her availablity. We have no idea which item of clothing or exactly where it was swabbed. Hell, we don't even reallly know just why it was swabbed. I can hazard a guess - a futile attempt to prove Karen's defense wrong. And that's what this entire prosecution seems to be. Rather than focusing on providing evidence of Karen's alleged guilt, they seem to be playing defense.

After the four Alberts, Chris & Julie and Nicole & Brian, we heard from the birthday boy himself, Brian Albert Jr. As well as the friends who attended his little get together. Some left before midnight and the rest were driven home by Nicole Albert's sister and her husband. I honestly cannot remember their testimony, I think they just sat around the dining room table, drinking beer, listening to music. A couple mentioned they danced. I believe they were trotted through the court to establish a timeline for the arrival and departure of Colin Albert, the son of Chris & Julie Albert. Except for one notable exception: Julie Nagel.

According to her testimony, Julie Nagel contacted her brother to come and pick her up somewhere around midnight, just after the first set of guests left. As Julie was watching for his arrival, she saw Karen's SUV arrive and stop at the end of the driveway, then pull forward either once or twice until it arrived at the other side of the front yard, by the flag pole that John O'Keefe would later be found under. Julie claims when she went out to inform her brother that she changed her mind, she wanted to stay longer, Karen was gone. It was upon leaving at about 1:45 am that she saw a "black blob" on the lawn from her place behind the driver's seat, the side furthest away from said lawn, that she claimed was approximately 5' - 6' long. The front and back seat passengers had their heads turned toward the driver's side so nobody else saw this "blob."

Julie's brother, Ryan Nagel, also testified about seeing Karen's car as did the driver of that vehicle and the back seat passenger, Ryan's then girlfriend. All three said that Karen's car was still there when they left, refuting Julie's testimony, and that they had to pull around it to leave. And none of them saw a Jeep Wrangler with a plow on the front that should've been parked near the mailbox, near the driveway. Which would've been between this vehicle and Karen's SUV. I don't know why this is important but this disappearing/reappearing Jeep is rather fascinating to me.

Jury view of Karen's SUV in front of 34 Fairview

I shold add that everybody in the truck Ryan arrived and left in saw Karen in her vehicle but did not see John. Although one of them saw two people when they first pulled up, but only Karen when they left. I believe all of this occurred around the time or just after (?) Colin Albert allegedly left. Speaking of, we heard from Ali McCabe, who ostensibly picked Colin up and drove him home, arriving back to her own home by 12:30 am. Defense Atty. David Yanetti asked her about some Life 260 data that had her driving around for about an hour after. Ali was adament that, while she seems to have spent all evening traveling around Canton, rescuing a puppy for a bit of that time, she was tucked into bed by 12:30. 

Colin Albert claims he was dropped off then picked up at 12:10 am by his BFF Ali that night. He just wanted to stop in to wish Brian Jr. a happy 23rd birthday. Oddly Ali, who is also a cousin of Brian Jr., had no inclination to do the same. Poor Brian Jr.'s birthday seems to only be brought up to justify his parents going out to the bar without him (yes, that makes no sense) as well as why his aunt & uncle, Jennifer & Matt McCabe later (after the all important 12:10 am time) came over after they, too, celebrated at the bar. Oh, and why Julie Albert tried to sneak some Dunkin' Donuts into Brian Jr.'s car the next morning (maybe with coffee).

Little side note, it seems Brian Jr. was supposed to meet his family at the bar but he has anxiety and wasn't feeling up to it. I know Aunty Jen and Uncle Matt went to drown their sorrows after their daughter, Ali's, team lost a high school basketball game. In my family we prioritize the birthday boy or girl, letting them chose when/where/how to celebrate, so I'm left befuddled at how all these people behaved.

Another note: Brian & Nicole Albert's house has a front door as well as a side door leading to a breezeway between the house and garage. Everybody but Colin clomped up and down the sidewalk and stairs to the front door for this little shindig while he said he left via the side entrance. I wonder how his Uncle Brian & Aunt Nicole somehow bumped into him. Given that 12:10 am time, it seems they should've missed each other, like ships passing in the night, given that the entrances are on each side of the kitchen/dining area. Maybe that's just me, though.

[Well, dang, I completely forgot about Caitlin Albert and her boyfriend, Tristan. The two were at the bar with her parents, Brian & Nicole. Tristan went home before midnight while Caitlin stayed and hitched a ride back to the family home. She saw Colin in the foyer area inside the main front door for just a few minutes before he left. So, which door did he actually leave from? Inquiring minds wanna know.

Tristan doesn't remember much and has no idea what time anybody did anything, including himself. Nobdy seems to think it odd that the poor man, who was slated to plow snow, was awoken after only maybe a few hours of sleep to come and pick his girlfriend up. Yes, it seems that Caitlin was gonna stay over but changed her mind for some reason.]

Defense atty. Alan Jackson brought some fire in the cross examination of Colin, showing him as a young thug rather than the choir boy appearence he portrayed on the stand. I'm guessing the delicate little cross necklaces worn by a few of the female witnesses wasn't to his tast. Colin's knuckles seem to be regularly busted which he claims are from catching himself by his right knuckles while slipping on the ice and later by hitting a heavy bag. He also likes to make threatening videos while drunk to post on social media. I guess it's a good thing he no longer has any social media, huh? He, like many witnesses before him, has a selectively terrible memory. His favorite word seems to be "nope," much like how David Yanetti described lead investigator Trooper Procter texting to a friend on whether or not the homeowners lawn, whose body Ofc. John O'Keefe's body was found on, would get in trouble. The same person we've yet to hear from, the one who's the subject of an internal investigation. But I digress.

I believe the next person on the stand was Matthew McCabe who works in IT but comes off as a used car salesman (to me, anyway). He and his wife, Jennifer, are the only two besides Brian & Nicole Albert, the homeowners, that talked about the aforementioned Jeep with a plow. This man spent  an inordinate amount of time looking out the windows &/or the main front door, witnessing Karen's SUV parked in 3 different places along the front curb. He did not see a black blob when he left but he did see "weird wavy" tire tracks in the road in what others described as a "dusting" of snow. He's quite the chatterbox which I think is why I get "used car salesman" vibes from him. I guess he was peering out the window(s)/front door because his wife is the one who was directing Karen and John to the house. He didn't see John get out of the car so definitely didn't see him come into the house. While Jen drove from the bar to the house, he was the one who drove home, dropping off two of Brian Jr.'s friends. He did not see or hear about a "black blob." He saw absolutely nothing on the lawn when he left.

He claims he was awoken the next morning at about 5 am by screaming coming from his wife's phone. I do not know if it was on speaker or not. My impression is that it wasn't, but I could be wrong. It was apparently Karen who was screaming, which she seemed to do a lot of that fateful morning. She screamed Jen's name, she screamed she had a broken tail light, she screamed about John and how she hit him. Then Karen drove to their house and screamed the same on the front lawn. He expressed concern about his wife driving in car with a broken tail light in the snow (but driving drunk is A-OK) and stayed home with the kids they left alone the night before (oops, is my petty showing?).

Mattie likes to report to his bro-in-law, Brian Albert, about police presence around his house. Brian's that is. This was brought to light by David Yanetti's cross, where he went through some family group text messages that also included their wives. His muttered "what the hell" and "oh my god" indicates that Mattie was not happy that these texts were discovered. It is rumored that the feds provided them via their own investigation. Was Mattie not informed that this info was made available? Or even that it was a possibility? Did Adam Lally not prepare his witnesses? If not, why not? I wonder what else the feds provided? I guess we shall see.

Aside from the causal racism, why is Mattie wanting to take pics of troopers conducting what one would futily hope is an investigation? But more daming is the following:

Mattie is referring to Kerrie Roberts in the top three, someone we've yet to hear from in trial. She's the person who drove Karen Read and Mattie's wife, Jen McCabe, to 34 Fairview the morning Ofc. John O'Keefe was found laying on the ground. Looks like Mattie is somehow listening in on an interview? Interesting. But what's even more interesting is the bottom three. "Tell them the guy never went in the house." Tell who? And why would this need to be told? If he didn't go in, he didn't go in. If he did but you don't want to admit it, I guess you'd have to go around telling people he didn't. Again, just me? 

The last witness to take the stand on Friday, May 17 2023, was Mattie's wife and Nicole Albert's sister, Jennifer McCabe. She told quite the tale but I'm gonna save it for the next article, after she gets crossed by Alan Jackson. I'm quite looking forward to it. What a tangled web she tried to weave and I think Jackson will destroy it but we shall see.

If you like what I have to say consider following and/or tipping me – https://linktr.ee/BeingBel. Tips will go toward groceries and bills. I just want to contribute to our household at this time. Thanks so much!

community logo
Join the SimplyBel Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
August 18, 2023
Andy Signore is striking YT channels that shared his parody video

The cover is a still from the original video, the second is part of that parody that was created. Note that NEITHER show ANY nudity WHATSOEVER. He doesn't want the general public to know what a perverted scum bag he is. This week started off with a bang when he popped in Saggy Melonz live stream on Sat Aug 12. Andy Signore is triggered and running scared, IMO!

00:00:23
August 26, 2023
Chronicles of Andy Signore

Just storing this here since Andy Signore is striking google docs...

Chronicles_of_Andy_Signore_(3).pdf
Funerals are for the living.

Today is an odd day. It's been a decade/15 years since I lost my own parents and we didn't have traditional burial rights for either of them. It's been quite awhile since I took part in a Catholic funeral mass, which will be tomorrow for my father-in-law. Today is the interminable visitation although I highly doubt we'll be there for the entire 7 hours. Or at least, I hope not.

When I go, just cremate me and sprinkle me in the ocean to swim with dolphins. Or in Lake Superior just 'cuz I think it's cool. Have a party if you're so inclined and play some Pat Benatar, a little Enya, some Neil Diamond. Classic 70's rock and 80's pop. Maybe plant a tree.

Funerals are for the living even though we like to claim they're for the dead. Well, honoring the dead, anyway. The pomp and circumstance can be soothing to some, and others view it as an obligation. I fall in neither category and, more importantly, neither do my husband & son. However, these are the wishes of my step mother-in-law so we will...

November 05, 2024
Truth about Britt

Deleted post from Sept 2023

truth_about_britt_updated.pdf
August 20, 2025
post photo preview
Which are the Good Faith Actors?

While I was on my latest social media hiatus journalist Jess Machado posted her first interview on her new YouTube (YT) channel. Who did she choose as her subject? Notorious anti-free Karen Read (AFKR) figure, Kate Peter (KP) (or  "Krusty Panties" as fellow journalist Aidan Kearny has dubbed her). I have not watched the interview nor do I intend to - why would I subject myself to a known liar lying? Jess had to know that FKR would have feelings about this particular choice, that many of her "besties" would experience shock and disappointment. Unless KP came clean about her true reason for her AFKR stance and how it really was all about her hatred of Aidan. Dang it, now I just might hafta take a peek.

However, from what I'm seeing on X, it seems people are upset with Jess for publicly airing grievances with LTL media, a YT channel she appeared on weekly during the second trial of Karen Read. Particularly about a video that may or may not exist regarding the death of Mass. State Trooper trainee Enrique Delgado Garcia. This is a story that Brian of LTL has had his teeth sunk into since the end of last year, 2024. Garcia purportedly died of a brain aneurism during a training exercise although I'm wondering if that happened before or after his neck was broken (amongst other injuries). Hell of a coincidence, right?

Apparently, Brian gave Jess a glimpse of said video and claims she could've asked him to play it if she wanted to see the whole thing. Jess wonders why he hasn't shared it with the world. Brian has also said he does not actually possess it but has seen it. Logic dictates to me that Jess is the one telling the truth. And I think she's probably been pushing him to do something constructive with it. How much more could a paid guest do? Yes, that's the other thing that has stuck in the craw of many: Jess required payment to appear on Brian's show - an arrangement that both seemed comfortable with. This may well be standard in the TV industry but it strikes an odd chord with those of us who consume our news via social media.

Now I'm gonna rewind my way back to the reason for my hiatus - the downfall of someone we saw as a staunch supporter of Karen Read, Estey, and the rise of a pain in the ass named John Baron who seemed particularly aggrieved by another staunch FKR, Nan AKA Lawferio. I don't believe the two are connected, they just happened around the same time. It seems Estey just likes to sucker fish to large trials, her last one being another that is near and dear to my heart: Johnny Depp v Amber Heard (I'm JD all the way, BTW). As for John Baron, it turns out that it was an account shared by AFKR and FKR personalities. I have no idea why they picked on Nan. Jealousy and/or boredom are the only things that spring to mind. It's the height of stupidity to defame a successful lawyer, IMO.

Just for funsies, let's wrap all of this up and tie it with a ribbon called, "I was disappointed in Karen Read's party & other disgruntlements." LTL/Brian said he just sat back and observed the party because that's just how he is, now he's upset about not being included more. Or maybe it's more about not getting the recognition he thought he'd earned which is what Rita Lombardi's and Sean on the Gulf's complaints were about, too. Personally, what I do is because I feel it's right, not because I want kudos. I mean, they're nice, don't get me wrong, but they're not my reason d'etre. I'm about the same age as Rita & Sean - we're of an age that we're supposed to have some wisdom. Aparently that's about as rare as common sense.

In the end, I guess it comes down to what I'm willing to tolerate. I'm all for good fun but not when it comes at the expense of others. I guess I'm simply not up for schadenfreude.

Schadenfreude refers to the joy you might feel at another person’s pain. It’s a compound of the German nouns Schaden, meaning “damage,” and Freude, meaning “joy.”  Merriam-Webster

Read full Article
post photo preview
Jennifer Coffindaffer is Tired, Poor Thing!
The sham trial of Karen Read

Former (supposed) FBI agent Jennifer Coffindaffer says some ridiculous things on X regarding the Karen Read trial (amongst others). This one caught my eye yesterday:

Let's break it down:

The Top Ten Reasons why I can't Wait for the Karen Read trial to be over:

1-Tired of all the dissent in the True Crime Community. 

Most of those in the "True Crime Community" realize that, at the very least, the investigation was sorely lacking thus engendering feelings of a whole shit ton of reasonable doubt. People who truly believe Karen Read is guilty should be mad as hell at disgraced former trooper Michael Proctor yet they're not. I find this incredibly odd. It's almost like they agree with his whole "pin it on the girl" strategy.

2-Tired of trying to explain that there is 0 proof that an ATF Agent (who has his job and was not reprimanded in anyway much less accused of murder), a 30+ year Boston Police Officer (featured on Boston's Finest and retired with distinction about 2 years After the crime), a dog (sent to Vermont months after the crime due to a fight she had with another dog), and a minor (not even worth mentioning) Murdered John O'Keefe and brilliantly threw him in their front lawn.

So, stop trying to excuse ... er, explain stuff regarding people you don't even know. Higgins is on desk duty (last we heard, anyway), Brian Albert has a history of beating people up, a dog whose owners called the poor girl "it" and made her disappear the night of the incident only for her to reappear then end up being "rehomed," and a thug in the making. Btw, it's curious that you, of all people, knew where Chloe supposedly was when even the defense team didn't. The rest of us learned during her "mom" Nichole Albert's testimony well into trial #1. Another oddity, IMO.

3- Tired of listening to Alessi. 

I'm so sorry that Alessi is too smart and well spoken for some to understand. Personally, I'm tired of Hank Brennan's incessant whining. 

4- Tired of watching Karen Read's courtroom antics. 

No idea what you're talking about here. Do you mean her being an active and valued member of her own defense team?

5- Tired of reading all of the dribble from those who haven't watched the trial but pretend they have.

I think the word you're looking for is "drivel" and those who rebut you probably *have* watched the trial, you just don't like their viewpoints. Many also probably watched some, if not all, pretrial (especially for this second trial). I certainly have. The CW's own ME said Ofc O'Keefe's injuries were inconsistent with a motor vehicle strike. What are we even doing here?

6- Tired of the podcasters flushing truth for viewership.

Same girl, same but opposite. I'm tired of those that have flushed their integrity in order to push the CW's false narrative. However, I'm glad to weed out those who apparently lack critical thinking skills.

7- Tired of the Blogger's filthy mouth and lies. 

So don't watch/listen to him or read his articles. Easy fix, right?

8- Tired of Watching the Fan.

Agreed.

9- Tired of a simple Occam's Razor Domestic Violence case being made into a Cecil B. Deville drama fest.

I'm tired of people who think that cops running a crappy investigation is A-OK as long as whoever they deem to be the "bad guy" gets put away. I'm also tired of people shitting on our US Constitution and using the Bill of Rights to wipe their ass.

And number 10: Tired of watching a spoiled one continue to mock the death of a wonderful soul named John O'Keefe.

Nobody finds humor in the death of OFFICER John O'Keefe. Many see the tragedy in that some of his fellow brothers in blue didn't give him the honor he was due by conducting a proper investigation, exploring all avenues, in order to figure out what truly happened to him. Instead, he was just "a man," "the guy," and, ultimately, the victim. He's not even referred to as a Boston Police Officer in much of the CW's case. 

I will continue to advocate for justice in this case because it's the right thing to do.

Justice means not trampling over someone's rights. It means recognizing shoddy police work. It means not rushing to judgement. It means a thorough and proper investigation. It means not resorting to trickery in an attempt to secure a conviction. It means not ignoring inconvenient truths. 

This trial has brought to light how some DA's offices along with their local law enforcement sometimes works to railroad innocnt people. As attorney Mark Bederow likes to say, they're supposed to be the good guys. With Karen Read, we're seeing that's not always the case which is pretty eye opening, IMO. I have learned to take a closer look at how cases are investigated and garnered even more appreciation for the role of defense attorneys. Like many others, I've come to understand that the government does not generally have our best interest in mind. Sometimes they need their feet held to the fire. We can learn much from criminal defense attorneys Bob & Ali Motta (Defense Diaries), Andrea Burkhart (Andrea Burkhart), Ian Runkle (Runkle of the Bailey) and Natalie Whittingham Burrell (natalielawyerchick) as well as former prosecutor Emily D. Baker (The Emily Show). I would be remiss if I did not mention Attorney Melanie Little for complete covereage since pre-trial 1 and Peter Tragos (Lawyer You Know) for his unbiased and nuanced coverage. These are just a handful of lawyers on social media that are covering and/or commenting on this case. Those worth following point out the myriad of issues and just how much reasonable doubt there is.

FREE KAREN READ

Read full Article
post photo preview
Commonwealth of MA vs Karen Read retrial
The more things change the more they stay the same.

Those of us who sat through the interminable first trial of Karen Read had some tempered hope when an outsider, defense attorney Hank Brennan, was brought into for this retrial. That this newly appointed special ADA would look through the evidence and ask Michael Morrissey WTF he was thinking when he brought charges against Karen. Or, at minimum, recognize the overreach of the second degree murder charge. These hopes were dashed when Brennan switched from wanting a fair trial for Karen to wanting one for the Commonwealth of MA (CW).* He seemed determined to dig deeply into the federal investigation of the investigation of the death of Officer John O'Keefe but not in the direction that those of us on the FKR side hoped he would. He completely ignored the exculpatory information provided by the feds in a 3000+ page Touhey report. Instead it seems he did his level best to figure out what the government had on the Norfolk County DA's Office (NCDAO). When he failed at that, he attempted to discredit the defense in as dirty a way as possible: Make it look like they were colluding with the FBI or, at the very least, their experts from ARCCA who opined that John was not hit by Karen's car and Karen's car was not damaged by hitting John.

Hank Brennan and James
James "Whitey" Bulger and Hank Brennan

Did I mention that Hank Brennan was on the team that unsuccessfully defended James "Whitey" Bulger, infamous Irish mob boss and murderer? And that he cried at his funeral? I personally did not know this when he was first appointed but it makes sense now. Who better to defend the NCDAO than a mob lawyer? That's how those in the know were describing him from the beginning. I though that nobody could be worse than DA Michael Morrissey and his corrupt crew: ADA Adam Lally & ADA Laura McLaughlin. Boy was I wrong! Lally mumble fumbled his way through the first trial, using "what if any" so many times I wanted to smack my head into my keyboard. Droning on about the snow and high top tables and shoveling aprons until I thought my ears were gonna bleed. Then along came Hank Brennan and his incessant whining. Suddenly, I missed Lally, which I didn't think would ever be possible. Speaking of, has anybody else noticed that Lally turned into a real prosecutor under Hank's tutelage? Suddenly he's loud, clear and concise with his questioning although he's been relegated to the most minor and most boring of witnesses. 

Hank Brennan, Adam Lally and Laura McLaughlin
Hank Brennan, Adam Lally and Laura McLaughlin

Brennan has been running this trial like a defense attorney trying to trip up witnesses during cross examination. In other words, his presentation does not seem to be linear (what follows is not necessarily in order): EMS first responders, Kerry Roberts, more EMS first responders, Sara Levinson (who was inside 24 Fairview that night), Ian Wiffen & Jessica Hyde (the CW's two cell phone experts), Jennifer McCabe, retired Canton police dept. Sgt. Paul Gallagher (who arrived after John O'Keefe was transported to the hospital), Yuri Bukhenik (lead investigator Michael Proctor's supervisor and partner). Oh, and the two passangers of the vehicle that arrived and left 34 Fairview during the time Karen Read was outside in her Lexus waiting to hear from John O'Keefe (but not the driver for whatever reason). MST Nicholas Guarino also took the stand a few times to enter John's & Karen's cell phone evidence. Notably absent were any police officers that first responded to the scene, the lead investigator and the medical examiner, all of which are generally standard witnesses in a criminal case.

Jen McCabe

Jen McCabe, an early witness in this retrial, received a glow up from the last trial. She mostly remained cool, calm and collected during her 3 days of testimony. She and most of the EMS personnel that testified earnestly stated that their memories have gotten better over time. You would think that people even tangentially involved in law enforcement would know that this is patently untrue. However, I guess it's as true as Trooper Paul's grasp on physics in his "accident reconstruction" for the last trial that had poor officer John O'Keefe bouncing off of his head and pirouetting onto the lawn of 34 Fairview on that fateful morning. Hopefully their new expert, Dr. Welcher of Aperture, has a more cogent argument.

A bunch of physical evidence has been presented but there doesn't seem to be any logs attesting to their provenance. Plainly said, there doesn't seem to be  any chain of custody on anything. The scene at 34 Fairview was left unsupervised from before 8 am until after 4 pm that day. John's clothing was discovered on the hospital floor (which makes sense), loaded into a paper lawn & leaf size bag by Bukhenik and Proctor, rode around in their car most of the day, then laid out on butcher paper at the NCDAO. It was logged into evidence six weeks later and two pieces were ensconced in plexiglass between the first and second trial. John's shoes, one of which was found at the hospital with the other found on the lawn of 34 Fairview, both seemed to end up in property bags identifying the latter location. A recess was called to address the problem then, magically, the second shoe was pulled out of a bag that said it was from the hospital. It also seems that Proctor just filled out evidence bags with either his or Bukhenik's names as he saw fit. There were no crime scene services (CSS) photos of the 47 pieces of tail light that "revealed themselves" over a good 3 weeks. A bunch had no pics at all. There was no sketch made of what was found where at the crime scene. It was never even established exactly where John O'Keefe was found, much less orientation or any kind of measurements. 

This case is an absolute clusterfuck and, so far, the prosecution has not proven a damn thing, IMO. We're over 3 weeks in and the jury has not heard what John's actual cause of death was determined to be. In this way, Brennan's bunny hop approach resembles Lally's slogfest in trial 1. Emily D. Baker has some excellent daily briefs if you want to follow along.

Remember: The truth does not change. Data doesn't lie, people do! FREE KAREN READ

*The US constitution only guarantees a fair trial for those accused of crimes not for the bodies accusing them.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals