SimplyBel
Writing
True Crime: Truth AND Justice
On Being a Thoughtful True Crime Consumer
June 13, 2024
post photo preview

I have no background in anything approaching a legal education so I rely on lawyers going over legal documents as I consume true crime. I also listen to those who have a proven track record in covering cases fairly. In my opinion, anyway. 

In an opinion piece on Fox News, a couple of podcasters who are or were prosecutors admonish viewers/listeners of this genre. In doing so, they've chosen some of the most problematic cases to use as illustrators. And here is where that record scratch effect resounds in my head as I read. Let's take a look:

Richard Allen - accused of murdering Abby Williams & Libby German

In Delphi, Indiana, Richard Allen, the accused murderer of thirteen-year-olds Abby Williams and Libby German, is preparing for trial. On February 13, 2017, the girls were brutally slain on a public hiking trial not far from their homes. Allen has placed himself on the trail at the time of the murders. Police have forensically linked him to the scene with a bullet that matches a gun he owns, and he has reportedly confessed multiple times to multiple people. But evidence is no match for a shocking story, well told.

Factually, nobody knows where the girls were actually killed. They are presumed to have been on the Monon High Bridge before they were discovered in a nearby forested area. Sometime after this area was released by law enforcement, an unspent bullet was found buried in the ground. This has allegedly been linked to Richard Allen via much disputed tool mark evidence. Allen has been housed in the department of corrections for Indiana, also known as prison, rather than held in a local jail. It is while within these confines that he's supposedly confessed, not in actual documented police interviews. 

Allen didn’t kill the girls, according to his attorneys. Rather, they were sacrificed by white supremacist members of the neo-pagan religion of Odinism, aided by a cover-up orchestrated by law enforcement. While one might expect that waking the echoes of the satanic panic would meet with derision, certain corners of the true crime world loved it.

The pagan angle was actually explored by law enforcement early in the investigation. This information was not turned over to the defense during discovery. So it appeared that the prosecution was gatekeeping information which isn't allowed. Personally, my brain just said, "WTF" regarding this odinism stuff until Allen's second set of lawyers, briefly appointed by the judge, also brought the idea up. This is when my interest was piqued. Although it was more about the fact that the judge fired a set of court appointed attorneys who then fought to continue the case pro bono. There was a hearing held by the supreme court of Indiana to have them reinstated. None of this was mentioned by the opinion writers, though.

Recently, Allen’s true crime supporters launched a legal defense fund, advertising it with the hashtag "Justice for Abby and Libby," the names of the girls Allen is accused of brutally murdering. As of this writing, more than 700 people have donated in excess of $40,000 to the cause. 

What's been left out is that the judge refuses to approve funds for Allen's defense team to hire experts. In fact, last I heard, the lawyers themselves have not yet been fully reimbursed. Our consititution guarantees a fair trial for all those accused, even men who've allegedly killed young girls. They are also presumed innocent which you'd think supposed prosecutors would understand but it seems not. For this and the other two cases mentioned in this opinion piece, it's shocking how many apparent legal/law enforcement commentators downplay these rights. Keep this idea in mind as we continue on.

Karen Read - accused of murdering boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe

In Boston, Massachusetts, the trial of Karen Read drags on. The former financial analyst and professor stands accused of striking and killing her Boston Police Department boyfriend, John O’Keefe, with her Lexus. Read maintains her innocence, but true crime bloggers, YouTubers, and podcasters didn’t need a trial to decide what they thought had happened. O’Keefe was murdered by a fellow officer, and law enforcement was framing Read to cover it up. One popular blogger named Turtleboy—Aidan Kearney in his non-true crime life—became so convinced of Read’s innocence that he launched what prosecutors claim was a campaign of harassment and witness intimidation. While Read stands trial for murder, Kearney now faces at least 16 felony charges himself.  

I am currently watching this trial and it's shocking just how screwed up this investigation was. People who were reading through filings and watching hearings already knew some of this. This is what Kearny has been covering for awhile now. Massachusettes seems to have a law that labels what citizen reporters do as "witness intimidation." It might behoove certain legal representatives to read through some court documents. Just a suggestion.

Brian Kohberger - accused of murdering 4 Idaho college students

It seems all of the opinion writers' wrath is aimed at a Tik Tok psychic who's made wild claims against a local university professor. The professor is suing the so-called psycic. There may well be problems with the state's case in this instance, too, but those are not mentioned in the article. Neither are the 4 students' names: Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin.

I'm supposing that what sticks in the craws of those writing the opinion piece for Fox News is that the defense attorneys for all three cases seem to absolutely believe in their clients' innocence and are fighting hard for them. However, EVERY defendent is constitutionally guaranteed the right to zealous advocacy which is highlighted beautifully in these examples, IMO. I've learned much watching those covering these cases and have a new found respect for defense attorneys, especially those appointed by the state. Is this idea what is truly bothering the writers?

While I do agree that some of those covering True Crime are exploitative and certain documentaries/docuseries are sensationalistic, many are not. And the more we learn about our justice system, the better, IMO. When seeking justice for victims, it means convicting the right perpetrator. And doing it in the proper way, not by underhanded means.

Blackstone's Ratio says, “the law holds that it is better that 10 guilty persons escape, than that 1 innocent suffer.” Every lawyer commentator I follow believes this doctrine to be true. If a prosecution cannot withstand bright light being shone upon it, we're right to ask questions. Our US justice system should also be able to withstand the same. And I think that those that work or have worked within this system and have become content creators do their watchers/listeners a disservice if they refuse to shine a similar light. I also think this is much of what defines a thoughtful true crime consumer.

community logo
Join the SimplyBel Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
August 18, 2023
Andy Signore is striking YT channels that shared his parody video

The cover is a still from the original video, the second is part of that parody that was created. Note that NEITHER show ANY nudity WHATSOEVER. He doesn't want the general public to know what a perverted scum bag he is. This week started off with a bang when he popped in Saggy Melonz live stream on Sat Aug 12. Andy Signore is triggered and running scared, IMO!

00:00:23
August 26, 2023
Chronicles of Andy Signore

Just storing this here since Andy Signore is striking google docs...

Chronicles_of_Andy_Signore_(3).pdf
November 05, 2024
Truth about Britt

Deleted post from Sept 2023

truth_about_britt_updated.pdf
Are Elaine Bredahoft and Adam Lally related?

It's been two years since the Depp v Heard trial but, in watching the Karen Read trial, I'm having big time flashbacks. It feels like the DA's office of Norfolk County Massachusetts said, "hold my beer." Elaine "what if any" Bredehoft would be quite jealous of how many times Adam Lally has gotten away with the phrase during this trial. Amber Heard would weep (with or without actual tears) at the sheer number of witnesses the commonwealth of MA has paraded through the courtroom to bolster it's claims. 

Those adamantly in the "Karen Read is guilty" camp seem to be as firmly entrenched as those who believe in Amber Heard's innocence. And take just as much relish in trolling those on the other side. However, while many (myself included) believe that Johnny Depp was abused by Amber Heard, nobody ended up dead. Nobody was facing life in prison. There was no clearly grieving family. 

Matt McCabe calls Officer John O'Keefe "the guy" while his wife constantly reminds us that John was their ...

February 13, 2025
post photo preview
Lessons From my Mother
Kids are people, too!

When my son was 7 months old my mother had a massive stroke that almost killed her – she was only 59 and it just about shattered my world. She was my biggest cheerleader and my staunchest advocate. My son was her first grand-baby and she was in the room with me when I gave birth. She was his first babysitter and I called her just about daily with whatever was going on with him. We visited weekly after he was born and I remain profoundly grateful for that time together. All of this to say that after her stroke when we finally got her home, even with fairly profound aphasia she was able to give me some advise that has always shaped my life.

He's his own little person you know.

Growing up my mother never made me feel less than (unlike my father). She was always straight forward yet kept a bit of that "mom always knows" mysticism. She elegantly skated that fine line between honesty and keeping my baby sis and I sheltered from stuff we didn't need to know. For example, we were pretty poor when I was young but I had no clue that we were until years later. I guess I should've known just from the fact that we had a tiny black and white TV while my best friends family had a giant color TV but it was just how things were. She never complained and never put either of us girls in a bad spot between her and our father. When he went off she would only step in when he was being completely unfair, otherwise we knew she was on our side and would come to us after, which we were fine with. Without saying a word we just seemed to understand how our family dynamic worked. Us girls would just share glances with each other that my dad was completely oblivious to (or just ignored) that kept us more or less on an even keel.

Even though my father could be an emotionally abusive asshat, he certainly wasn't all bad. With a different woman, perhaps he would've been the sort of parent who thought their children were possessions. Not with my mother, though. Her core belief that children were their own people always shone through and it was lesson I never really needed to be told, it was a fact of our lives. And, again, I am profoundly grateful.

Many years later my sister in law (who was one of my best friends from 3rd period biology class on the first day of our freshman year in high school) would tell me the story of her mom calling mine in a quandary over some dress Ann (my now sis in law) wanted to wear to some shin dig the two of them were going to. Ann's mom was concerned the outfit was "too revealing," and my mom pointed out that Ann was an adult and could wear whatever she wanted. Rachel (Ann's mom) didn't like that answer. Ann had an enviable hour glass figure and was well endowed so, unless she wore a turtleneck muumuu, any dress would reveal something. In my mind I see an off the shoulder floral number with a full skirt so it's not like Ann wanted to wear a strapless micro-mini. My mother knew Ann quite well and treated her as she treated everybody - especially children - as their own people. I think she tried to impart that wisdom onto Rachel who begrudgingly accepted it and Ann did, indeed, wear that dress (and looked spectacular).

Growing up, my mother never interfered in our friendships. If she was iffy about a person she'd allow us to come to our own realizations and later say, "I never liked so-and-so," lol. And she trusted us to eventually come to these realizations in our own time. Aloud she informed us that she would always believe our teachers over us so we knew not to try to lie. However, when we were treated unfairly, she stood up for us. Yet another balancing act she seemed to pull off with ease although I now know that it wasn't really all that easy. But when you make the effort to get to know your children as people you understand them far better than they understand themselves and it give you keen insight into their psyches. Which you always hold with loving kindness because of the respect you've afforded them as their birthright.

After mom's stroke and our fight to get her home I was sitting with her as she sat up in bed with a breakfast tray on her lap. My 11 month old son toddled in, looked around, and toddled out. Mom pointed her spoon at me and said, clear as a bell, "he's his own person you know." I did know and that is how I have always treated him. Today he's a strapping 6 foot tall full grown man with a glorious head of hair, a keen mind and wit, and a gentle nature. He doesn't smoke (unlike my hubby and I), very rarely drinks and has never done a single drug. And absolutely none of this was my doing, I do not take credit – it's all him. However, I did raise him as his own person. I'm not nearly as good of a mother as my own was but I try.

The impetus for this article is because I just watched CLR Bruce Rivers video regarding the death of his son and my heart breaks. My own son will be 27 years old this year, the same age as Michael, and I cannot imagine how devastated Bruce is. Watching their interactions for the past few years reminds me of mine with my son so I get the feeling Bruce raised his son much as I raised mine (and how I was raised). He is not responsible for his son's choices and, for those who are less than gracious, you should know that none of us parents are. We do our best and also hope for the best when we send our children out into the world. We are there for our offspring, we help as much as we are allowed, we try to give them soft landing places. We do not dictate to them, we do not try to force them to do anything, we understand that our children are not possessions, they are people. We love them unconditionally, we're always proud and we keep our disappointment to ourselves unless it's a gentle learning lesson for their greater good.

Read full Article
November 17, 2024
Andy Signore is still a reprehensible asshat
Truth will always prevail

Being able to engage in a sort of "read only" mode on X to peek at the accounts of those that have blocked you is both a blessing and a curse. Just recently it helped confirm to me that the boundary I set was my best course of action. However, their comments are in complete opposition to my experience.

The most dangerous psychological mistake is the projection of the shadow on to others; this is the root of almost all conflicts. ~Carl Jung

I've seen the phrase "confession through projection" referred to as the art of gaslighting. Viva Frei, who coined it, once opined that it represents a “total lack of self-awareness that would be funny if it weren’t so sad.”

In narcissistic abuse it's called DARVO: Deny and reverse victim and offender.

When it comes to the demise of a 2 year friendship, it just sucks. I honestly did not think this would be the outcome when I left the chat group, left the Discord server, left the YouTube channel. I figured I could go back once things calmed down. I only get that dramatic to make a point, generally I'm fairly laid back. When others were booted and blocked I wondered if my actions had bigger consequences than I ever imagined.

Questioning my behaviors and feelings these last few days, not to justify my actions but in an attempt to understand the situation, I wonder if I ever saw things as they truly were. Perhaps this outcome was always inevitable. shrug This is not the first person I've shed since I left Popcorned Planet but it is the one who's been around the longest, excluding our core group.

One person hiding most of their channel does not make Andy Signore any less of a reprehensible asshat no matter how many "andy was right" hashtags you use. There are too many he has harmed, too many that have seen his behavior, to be completely silenced. And I imagine they won't take kindly to being thrown under the bus. Not because of anything said aloud, but because they will also be able to also see your behavior. Truth will always prevail.

Read full Article
November 15, 2024
End of an Era

Just recently the movement of calling Andy Signore out on his bullshit has been dealt a blow. A former staunch supporter has not only turned their back but deleted years worth of content calling him out. What does that accomplish? Perhaps nothing more than giving Andy gleeful satisfaction. It's not like he's gonna announce it on his main channel although it may be heavily hinted at. 

We've weathered storms before, especially regarding a couple of liars. We've endured betrayal and, while it hurts, it has no bearing on the truth we tell. I was writing about Signore, amongst many other topics, well before I met them so their actions have no bearing on my behavior now or in the future. 

Erasing us doesn't negate us. I know I've lost a few followers, especially on X where my discontent was clear to see, but that won't stop me from speaking out on Andy Signore's reprehensible and repulsive behavior. However, these days I only comment on situations that are brought to my attention, I rarely seek them out. Signore is not my only topic of conversation as you can see - both here and on my X account.

I'm a true crime junkie and a big fan of justice and due process. This means that injustice really grinds my gears which is readily apparent in the articles I write. I have very little patience with those that don't engage with good faith or try to play mind games. If you come at me I will eventually disengage, I protect my peace rabidly. I'm also allergic to confrontations which some may see as cowardly. That's fine, I own that. I also own that I will be passive/aggressive because of this allergy. If you wait a bit, that disengagement will take hold as I reset my boundaries.

So, while this set of circumstances is disheartening, and there will be an adjustment period, all it truly does is close off one avenue regarding one topic amongst the many I cover. For me the worst part is witnessing the hurt being endured by some of the best people I have ever had the privilege of knowing and calling friends. Sure, it's the end of a 2 year era but it's also the beginning of a new one. I've not looked for nor cared about any amount of "fame" any more than I've wanted "clout." I'm always just me, take it or leave it. And if you can't take it, please just leave.

What you think of me is none of my business. ~Wayne Dyer

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals