I'm giving up on recaps. They amused me in the beginning, as the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (CW) rolled out a bunch of witnesses that they appeared to be defending. Suffice it to say, we've come to the end of 7 weeks of trial and we still have no real idea how Boston police officer John O'Keefe died, much less made any headway on proving Karen Read did it. Except that a MA state police trooper said so. He also said a whole lot of other things, much of which isn't "safe for work." And that's not the worst part - he said much of it to a group of school friends in private texts unearthed by the FBI.
Those who are dead set on Karen being guilty brush off lead detective, er "case manager," Trooper Michael Proctor's nasty text messages as no big deal. He informs us the "integrity of the investigation" is intact in spite of the fact that his own words prove he has no personal integrity. Ironically, he defined the word "integrity" as "doing the right thing even when nobody's watching." The lack of self-awareness is astounding.
On the very first day of his so called "investigation," after talking to Jen & Matt McCabe and the homeowner whose lawn Ofc O'Keefe was found dead on, Brian Albert, Trooper Proctor determined that Karen Read was guilty. He claims there was "overwhelming evidence" found that day which he lists as the victim's shoe, 3 - 5 pieces of plastic supposedly from Read's broken tail light and a broken drinking glass. The former two were not seen by local law enforcement or anybody else on the scene that morning before the crime scene was released and it started snowing in earnest. Nor were the other 40 some odd pieces of supposed tail light found in the weeks after on the lawn of 34 Fairview, some of which were approximately the size of O'Keefe's shoe. None of which were properly documents and have big time chain of custody problems.
All of this from the man that kept the fact that he knew the Albert family to himself. That thought it was A-OK to make fun of Read's medical conditions to his high school buddies. That was ticked off that the medical examiner insisted on ruling the manner of O'Keefe's death as "undetermined." That lied about the time he towed Read's SUV to the Canton police department (who'd been recused from the investigation) by well over an hour. That waited months, sometimes more than 12, to interview anybody that had been at the Albert residence that fateful night. Although he did interview two women who'd been in Aruba with John & Karen the previous December before most of the precipient witnesses! This is the man whose investigation we're supposed to rely on to decide someone's fate?
What it does is call into question every other investigation Trooper Michael Procter has ever conducted including that of Brian Walshe who's been accused of murdering and dismembering his wife, Ana. If Walshe skates because Proctor thought it was more important to cover his friends' asses than actually investigate a crime, it will be a major travesty of justice. Arguably even more so than railroading Karen Read. As Alan Jackson, one of Read's defense attorney said, "shame on you, sir!"
Every Mass. state trooper has been ripped apart during cross because of this shoddy investigation. A group text that included Procter, his superviser Yuri Bukhenik and David DiCicco is also problematic for the state. It's not a good look when the medical examiner is deemed a "whack job" because she refuses to determine the manner of death a homocide. The chatters bemoaned the fact that, in spite of their best efforts at persuasion, she mostly refused to play ball. It will be interesting when the CW finally puts her on the stand. So far we've only had troopers' "expertise" opining on Ofc John O'Keefe's injuries.
Currently Joseph Paul is on direct for the CW as a supposed accident reconstructionist with tables of info that have no dates or times. His examination of the parts of Karen Read's car that should've recorded something, anything, at at the time she supposedly struck O'Keefe seems to have turned up nothing. And his "reconstruction" seems to just be him driving back and forth in a parking lot. Yet the CW is questioning the qualifications of the defense's reconstruction experts that are the same ones used by the Feds in their grand jury regarding the investigation of this case. You can't make this stuff up!
As I was filling my son in on this latest analysis (whether he wanted to hear it or not) I tried to recreate how Trooper Paul said Read's car hit O'Keefe: Car is to the left of O'Keefe, side swipes him in a way that causes the tail light to break and cut up his arm... Wait, was he standing in some sort of thug pose with his right arm crossed way over his left? Maybe I'm facing the wrong way. So, he's hit in the right arm and somehow flung 10 feet to the left? Oops, forgot he somehow smacked the back of his head on the curb before his flight... This is riduculous! As I was spinning around in the kitchen my son had snuck to the basement with that look on his face that said, "my mom is a little cray cray."
From the beginning of this trial I've struggled to understand the CW's case. Now I'm struggling to understand why the CW brought this case. Even if Read had actually hit O'Keefe with her car the investigation was botched from the start so it can't be proven. It's possible Officer O"Keefe will never get justice. And while that's sad, what's even sadder is that every case investigated by Mass state troopers, especially those led by Procter, will be called into question due to his behavior on this one. So, yes, it's made me a little cray cray.
If you like what I have to say consider following and/or tipping me – https://linktr.ee/BeingBel. Tips will go toward groceries and bills. I just want to contribute to our household at this time. Thanks so much!