SimplyBel
Writing
The Experts have Spoken in CW of MA vs Karen Read
The Sham Trial of Karen Read
June 26, 2024
post photo preview

Following the Karen Read trial brings back many not so fond memories of playing whack-a-troll during Depp v Heard. Watchers from that trial that saw Heard's obvious lies seem to feel the same regarding a number of the Commonwealth's (CW) witnesse, especially Jen McCabe. For others, rather than hearing the almost complete lack of evidence against Ms Read, including from two highly educated independent accident reconstruction experts, provided by the federal government, some seem stuck in a sort of delusional opposite world. There were also a couple of medical doctors that opined that wounds on Officer O'Keefe's arm were consistent with wounds from an animal, possibly a large dog.

One X user, Jennifer Coffindaffer (JC), ridiculously stated:

An expert needs to see all the available facts to have an opinion or the opinion is rubbish. [1]

 

These "experts" were taken advantage of or just didn't care because they wanted the money and exposure. [2]

 

At the end of the day, again, the truth about Officer O'Keefe takes the backseat to money. [3]

The supposed evidence that the experts didn't consider?

*There was No Dog DNA on JohnOkeefe's clothes

 

*Officer O'Keefe's DNA was on the tail light

 

*Officer O'Keefe's hair DNA was on the rear of Read's Lexus

 

*Chloé's historical bite mark photo was not provided

 

*Tail light fragments were embedded in Officer O'Keefe's clothing.

However, ADA Adam Lally asked about these exact items and the experts unequivocally stated that their opinion wouldn't and did not change due to these dubious "facts." I'm certainly NOT an expert but lets go over this list, shall we?

There was No Dog DNA on JohnOkeefe's clothes

A Mass State police lab technician showed her two swab technique around the puncture holes on the sleeve of Ofc. O'Keefe's shirt. A shirt that wasn't entered into evidence until six weeks after the incident. She stated she'd never been instructed to swab clothes but gave it her best shot. Why wasn't the shirt itself sent out for testing? NONE of his clothing was sent to anybody for any sort of tests. The commonwealth picked and chose what to swab and send out. Interestingly, blood evidence on the jeans worn by John O'Keefe showed the presence of at least two other mystery contributors. Nobody at 34 Fairview that night were asked to give DNA samples although two of the Mass state troopers did ro rule out cross contamination. The wounds themselves were not swabbed and tested so the lack of dog DNA had no bearing on the experts opinions.

Officer O'Keefe's DNA was on the tail light

John and Karen had dated for two years and sometimes cohabitated so this is an absolute non-starter.

Officer O'Keefe's hair DNA was on the rear of Read's Lexus

See above

Chloé's historical bite mark photo was not provided

This is ridiculous. Forensic odontology in bite marks in humans was debunked years ago and, to my knowledge, it was never a thing for animals.

Tail light fragments were embedded in Officer O'Keefe's clothing

If they'd been recovered from his actual wounds, these may have had some bearing on whether or not John was actually hit by Karen's SUV. Plus, as stated above, there was a big evidentiary gap for the clothing. Also I believe said fragments were given to the lab in an envelope with no record of where or how they were recovered. This is a big problem with ALL the evidence in this case. The chain of custody wasn't just broken, it was pretty much nonexistant, IMO.

Too bad, so sad - the experts have spoken!

[1] An expert needs to see all the available facts to have an opinion or the opinion is rubbish.

Both expert reconstructionists stated that they considered "facts" later asserted plus what Lally asked in his cross examinations and it had no bearing on their investigation. Where did these experts come from and who hired them? Both are employed by ACRCA:

ARCCA was founded in 1987 by Alan Cantor, an engineer who specializes in protecting people during crash events. Prior to founding ARCCA, Mr. Cantor was credited with developing new life-saving occupant seating and restraint systems. The systems he worked on are still used today and have resulted in a significant reduction in fatalities and major injuries.

 

One of ARCCA’s first projects was to work with NASA and McDonnell Douglas in evaluating the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster and, as a result of this effort, new survival items became mandatory in all future U.S. Space Shuttle missions.

They were hired by the federal government's investigation into the investigation into this case. They were not paid by Karen Read's defense and their report was available to both them as well as the CW. However, their conclusions did not fit the CW's theory so they ignored them.

[2] These "experts" were taken advantage of or just didn't care because they wanted the money and exposure

ARRCA has worked with NASA so I don't think they need this trial for either money OR exposure. And Jenniffer Coffindaffer puting quotes around the word expert is not only disingeneous, it's disrespectful. Her supposed former employers, the FBI, were involved in hiring ARRCA, ffs. 

[3] At the end of the day, again, the truth about Officer O'Keefe takes the backseat to money

I sure hope JC didn't leap to these types of ludicrous conclusions when she was working for the FBI. Ironically, it's the FBI/DOJ that actually uncovered some actual facts in that they determined that John O'Keefe was not hit by a car and Karen Read's car did not hit a person. The only way they could figure out how her car's tail light was shattered was to build a pneumatic rocket and propel a facsimile of the glass found by Ofc O'Keefe's body at it because that would not have happened had it hit a soft body.

In determining whether O'Keefe was hit by a car or not, the expert pointed out that a glancing blow (a sideswipe, if you will, as proposed by the CW) would hit with 1000 lbs of force. This would result in at least some bruises which John did not have except on the backs of his hands (defensive wounds perhaps?). If the car had, in some insane way, hit the back of his hands bones would've been broken.

At the end of the day, Officer John O'Keefe was not hit by a car and Karen's car did not his Officer John O'Keefe!

If you like what I have to say consider following and/or tipping me – https://linktr.ee/BeingBel. Tips will go toward groceries and bills. I just want to contribute to our household at this time. Thanks so much!

community logo
Join the SimplyBel Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
August 18, 2023
Andy Signore is striking YT channels that shared his parody video

The cover is a still from the original video, the second is part of that parody that was created. Note that NEITHER show ANY nudity WHATSOEVER. He doesn't want the general public to know what a perverted scum bag he is. This week started off with a bang when he popped in Saggy Melonz live stream on Sat Aug 12. Andy Signore is triggered and running scared, IMO!

00:00:23
August 26, 2023
Chronicles of Andy Signore

Just storing this here since Andy Signore is striking google docs...

Chronicles_of_Andy_Signore_(3).pdf
November 05, 2024
Truth about Britt

Deleted post from Sept 2023

truth_about_britt_updated.pdf
Are Elaine Bredahoft and Adam Lally related?

It's been two years since the Depp v Heard trial but, in watching the Karen Read trial, I'm having big time flashbacks. It feels like the DA's office of Norfolk County Massachusetts said, "hold my beer." Elaine "what if any" Bredehoft would be quite jealous of how many times Adam Lally has gotten away with the phrase during this trial. Amber Heard would weep (with or without actual tears) at the sheer number of witnesses the commonwealth of MA has paraded through the courtroom to bolster it's claims. 

Those adamantly in the "Karen Read is guilty" camp seem to be as firmly entrenched as those who believe in Amber Heard's innocence. And take just as much relish in trolling those on the other side. However, while many (myself included) believe that Johnny Depp was abused by Amber Heard, nobody ended up dead. Nobody was facing life in prison. There was no clearly grieving family. 

Matt McCabe calls Officer John O'Keefe "the guy" while his wife constantly reminds us that John was their ...

February 13, 2025
post photo preview
Lessons From my Mother
Kids are people, too!

When my son was 7 months old my mother had a massive stroke that almost killed her – she was only 59 and it just about shattered my world. She was my biggest cheerleader and my staunchest advocate. My son was her first grand-baby and she was in the room with me when I gave birth. She was his first babysitter and I called her just about daily with whatever was going on with him. We visited weekly after he was born and I remain profoundly grateful for that time together. All of this to say that after her stroke when we finally got her home, even with fairly profound aphasia she was able to give me some advise that has always shaped my life.

He's his own little person you know.

Growing up my mother never made me feel less than (unlike my father). She was always straight forward yet kept a bit of that "mom always knows" mysticism. She elegantly skated that fine line between honesty and keeping my baby sis and I sheltered from stuff we didn't need to know. For example, we were pretty poor when I was young but I had no clue that we were until years later. I guess I should've known just from the fact that we had a tiny black and white TV while my best friends family had a giant color TV but it was just how things were. She never complained and never put either of us girls in a bad spot between her and our father. When he went off she would only step in when he was being completely unfair, otherwise we knew she was on our side and would come to us after, which we were fine with. Without saying a word we just seemed to understand how our family dynamic worked. Us girls would just share glances with each other that my dad was completely oblivious to (or just ignored) that kept us more or less on an even keel.

Even though my father could be an emotionally abusive asshat, he certainly wasn't all bad. With a different woman, perhaps he would've been the sort of parent who thought their children were possessions. Not with my mother, though. Her core belief that children were their own people always shone through and it was lesson I never really needed to be told, it was a fact of our lives. And, again, I am profoundly grateful.

Many years later my sister in law (who was one of my best friends from 3rd period biology class on the first day of our freshman year in high school) would tell me the story of her mom calling mine in a quandary over some dress Ann (my now sis in law) wanted to wear to some shin dig the two of them were going to. Ann's mom was concerned the outfit was "too revealing," and my mom pointed out that Ann was an adult and could wear whatever she wanted. Rachel (Ann's mom) didn't like that answer. Ann had an enviable hour glass figure and was well endowed so, unless she wore a turtleneck muumuu, any dress would reveal something. In my mind I see an off the shoulder floral number with a full skirt so it's not like Ann wanted to wear a strapless micro-mini. My mother knew Ann quite well and treated her as she treated everybody - especially children - as their own people. I think she tried to impart that wisdom onto Rachel who begrudgingly accepted it and Ann did, indeed, wear that dress (and looked spectacular).

Growing up, my mother never interfered in our friendships. If she was iffy about a person she'd allow us to come to our own realizations and later say, "I never liked so-and-so," lol. And she trusted us to eventually come to these realizations in our own time. Aloud she informed us that she would always believe our teachers over us so we knew not to try to lie. However, when we were treated unfairly, she stood up for us. Yet another balancing act she seemed to pull off with ease although I now know that it wasn't really all that easy. But when you make the effort to get to know your children as people you understand them far better than they understand themselves and it give you keen insight into their psyches. Which you always hold with loving kindness because of the respect you've afforded them as their birthright.

After mom's stroke and our fight to get her home I was sitting with her as she sat up in bed with a breakfast tray on her lap. My 11 month old son toddled in, looked around, and toddled out. Mom pointed her spoon at me and said, clear as a bell, "he's his own person you know." I did know and that is how I have always treated him. Today he's a strapping 6 foot tall full grown man with a glorious head of hair, a keen mind and wit, and a gentle nature. He doesn't smoke (unlike my hubby and I), very rarely drinks and has never done a single drug. And absolutely none of this was my doing, I do not take credit – it's all him. However, I did raise him as his own person. I'm not nearly as good of a mother as my own was but I try.

The impetus for this article is because I just watched CLR Bruce Rivers video regarding the death of his son and my heart breaks. My own son will be 27 years old this year, the same age as Michael, and I cannot imagine how devastated Bruce is. Watching their interactions for the past few years reminds me of mine with my son so I get the feeling Bruce raised his son much as I raised mine (and how I was raised). He is not responsible for his son's choices and, for those who are less than gracious, you should know that none of us parents are. We do our best and also hope for the best when we send our children out into the world. We are there for our offspring, we help as much as we are allowed, we try to give them soft landing places. We do not dictate to them, we do not try to force them to do anything, we understand that our children are not possessions, they are people. We love them unconditionally, we're always proud and we keep our disappointment to ourselves unless it's a gentle learning lesson for their greater good.

Read full Article
November 17, 2024
Andy Signore is still a reprehensible asshat
Truth will always prevail

Being able to engage in a sort of "read only" mode on X to peek at the accounts of those that have blocked you is both a blessing and a curse. Just recently it helped confirm to me that the boundary I set was my best course of action. However, their comments are in complete opposition to my experience.

The most dangerous psychological mistake is the projection of the shadow on to others; this is the root of almost all conflicts. ~Carl Jung

I've seen the phrase "confession through projection" referred to as the art of gaslighting. Viva Frei, who coined it, once opined that it represents a “total lack of self-awareness that would be funny if it weren’t so sad.”

In narcissistic abuse it's called DARVO: Deny and reverse victim and offender.

When it comes to the demise of a 2 year friendship, it just sucks. I honestly did not think this would be the outcome when I left the chat group, left the Discord server, left the YouTube channel. I figured I could go back once things calmed down. I only get that dramatic to make a point, generally I'm fairly laid back. When others were booted and blocked I wondered if my actions had bigger consequences than I ever imagined.

Questioning my behaviors and feelings these last few days, not to justify my actions but in an attempt to understand the situation, I wonder if I ever saw things as they truly were. Perhaps this outcome was always inevitable. shrug This is not the first person I've shed since I left Popcorned Planet but it is the one who's been around the longest, excluding our core group.

One person hiding most of their channel does not make Andy Signore any less of a reprehensible asshat no matter how many "andy was right" hashtags you use. There are too many he has harmed, too many that have seen his behavior, to be completely silenced. And I imagine they won't take kindly to being thrown under the bus. Not because of anything said aloud, but because they will also be able to also see your behavior. Truth will always prevail.

Read full Article
November 15, 2024
End of an Era

Just recently the movement of calling Andy Signore out on his bullshit has been dealt a blow. A former staunch supporter has not only turned their back but deleted years worth of content calling him out. What does that accomplish? Perhaps nothing more than giving Andy gleeful satisfaction. It's not like he's gonna announce it on his main channel although it may be heavily hinted at. 

We've weathered storms before, especially regarding a couple of liars. We've endured betrayal and, while it hurts, it has no bearing on the truth we tell. I was writing about Signore, amongst many other topics, well before I met them so their actions have no bearing on my behavior now or in the future. 

Erasing us doesn't negate us. I know I've lost a few followers, especially on X where my discontent was clear to see, but that won't stop me from speaking out on Andy Signore's reprehensible and repulsive behavior. However, these days I only comment on situations that are brought to my attention, I rarely seek them out. Signore is not my only topic of conversation as you can see - both here and on my X account.

I'm a true crime junkie and a big fan of justice and due process. This means that injustice really grinds my gears which is readily apparent in the articles I write. I have very little patience with those that don't engage with good faith or try to play mind games. If you come at me I will eventually disengage, I protect my peace rabidly. I'm also allergic to confrontations which some may see as cowardly. That's fine, I own that. I also own that I will be passive/aggressive because of this allergy. If you wait a bit, that disengagement will take hold as I reset my boundaries.

So, while this set of circumstances is disheartening, and there will be an adjustment period, all it truly does is close off one avenue regarding one topic amongst the many I cover. For me the worst part is witnessing the hurt being endured by some of the best people I have ever had the privilege of knowing and calling friends. Sure, it's the end of a 2 year era but it's also the beginning of a new one. I've not looked for nor cared about any amount of "fame" any more than I've wanted "clout." I'm always just me, take it or leave it. And if you can't take it, please just leave.

What you think of me is none of my business. ~Wayne Dyer

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals