Following the Karen Read trial brings back many not so fond memories of playing whack-a-troll during Depp v Heard. Watchers from that trial that saw Heard's obvious lies seem to feel the same regarding a number of the Commonwealth's (CW) witnesse, especially Jen McCabe. For others, rather than hearing the almost complete lack of evidence against Ms Read, including from two highly educated independent accident reconstruction experts, provided by the federal government, some seem stuck in a sort of delusional opposite world. There were also a couple of medical doctors that opined that wounds on Officer O'Keefe's arm were consistent with wounds from an animal, possibly a large dog.
One X user, Jennifer Coffindaffer (JC), ridiculously stated:
An expert needs to see all the available facts to have an opinion or the opinion is rubbish. [1]
These "experts" were taken advantage of or just didn't care because they wanted the money and exposure. [2]
At the end of the day, again, the truth about Officer O'Keefe takes the backseat to money. [3]
The supposed evidence that the experts didn't consider?
*There was No Dog DNA on JohnOkeefe's clothes
*Officer O'Keefe's DNA was on the tail light
*Officer O'Keefe's hair DNA was on the rear of Read's Lexus
*Chloé's historical bite mark photo was not provided
*Tail light fragments were embedded in Officer O'Keefe's clothing.
However, ADA Adam Lally asked about these exact items and the experts unequivocally stated that their opinion wouldn't and did not change due to these dubious "facts." I'm certainly NOT an expert but lets go over this list, shall we?
There was No Dog DNA on JohnOkeefe's clothes
A Mass State police lab technician showed her two swab technique around the puncture holes on the sleeve of Ofc. O'Keefe's shirt. A shirt that wasn't entered into evidence until six weeks after the incident. She stated she'd never been instructed to swab clothes but gave it her best shot. Why wasn't the shirt itself sent out for testing? NONE of his clothing was sent to anybody for any sort of tests. The commonwealth picked and chose what to swab and send out. Interestingly, blood evidence on the jeans worn by John O'Keefe showed the presence of at least two other mystery contributors. Nobody at 34 Fairview that night were asked to give DNA samples although two of the Mass state troopers did ro rule out cross contamination. The wounds themselves were not swabbed and tested so the lack of dog DNA had no bearing on the experts opinions.
Officer O'Keefe's DNA was on the tail light
John and Karen had dated for two years and sometimes cohabitated so this is an absolute non-starter.
Officer O'Keefe's hair DNA was on the rear of Read's Lexus
See above
Chloé's historical bite mark photo was not provided
This is ridiculous. Forensic odontology in bite marks in humans was debunked years ago and, to my knowledge, it was never a thing for animals.
Tail light fragments were embedded in Officer O'Keefe's clothing
If they'd been recovered from his actual wounds, these may have had some bearing on whether or not John was actually hit by Karen's SUV. Plus, as stated above, there was a big evidentiary gap for the clothing. Also I believe said fragments were given to the lab in an envelope with no record of where or how they were recovered. This is a big problem with ALL the evidence in this case. The chain of custody wasn't just broken, it was pretty much nonexistant, IMO.
Too bad, so sad - the experts have spoken!
[1] An expert needs to see all the available facts to have an opinion or the opinion is rubbish.
Both expert reconstructionists stated that they considered "facts" later asserted plus what Lally asked in his cross examinations and it had no bearing on their investigation. Where did these experts come from and who hired them? Both are employed by ACRCA:
ARCCA was founded in 1987 by Alan Cantor, an engineer who specializes in protecting people during crash events. Prior to founding ARCCA, Mr. Cantor was credited with developing new life-saving occupant seating and restraint systems. The systems he worked on are still used today and have resulted in a significant reduction in fatalities and major injuries.
One of ARCCA’s first projects was to work with NASA and McDonnell Douglas in evaluating the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster and, as a result of this effort, new survival items became mandatory in all future U.S. Space Shuttle missions.
They were hired by the federal government's investigation into the investigation into this case. They were not paid by Karen Read's defense and their report was available to both them as well as the CW. However, their conclusions did not fit the CW's theory so they ignored them.
[2] These "experts" were taken advantage of or just didn't care because they wanted the money and exposure
ARRCA has worked with NASA so I don't think they need this trial for either money OR exposure. And Jenniffer Coffindaffer puting quotes around the word expert is not only disingeneous, it's disrespectful. Her supposed former employers, the FBI, were involved in hiring ARRCA, ffs.
[3] At the end of the day, again, the truth about Officer O'Keefe takes the backseat to money
I sure hope JC didn't leap to these types of ludicrous conclusions when she was working for the FBI. Ironically, it's the FBI/DOJ that actually uncovered some actual facts in that they determined that John O'Keefe was not hit by a car and Karen Read's car did not hit a person. The only way they could figure out how her car's tail light was shattered was to build a pneumatic rocket and propel a facsimile of the glass found by Ofc O'Keefe's body at it because that would not have happened had it hit a soft body.
In determining whether O'Keefe was hit by a car or not, the expert pointed out that a glancing blow (a sideswipe, if you will, as proposed by the CW) would hit with 1000 lbs of force. This would result in at least some bruises which John did not have except on the backs of his hands (defensive wounds perhaps?). If the car had, in some insane way, hit the back of his hands bones would've been broken.
At the end of the day, Officer John O'Keefe was not hit by a car and Karen's car did not his Officer John O'Keefe!
If you like what I have to say consider following and/or tipping me – https://linktr.ee/BeingBel. Tips will go toward groceries and bills. I just want to contribute to our household at this time. Thanks so much!