The jury in the CW v Karen Read sent a note to Judge Beverly Canonne on Friday, informing her that they were unable to reach a consensus. They were told to keep going and had yet to reach a verdict by the end of the day, after 20 hours of deliberation. My brain cannot compute this as I believe there are oceans of reasonable doubt in this case. I'd like to list just some of the problems I see trying to keep in mind what the jury saw presented as evidence:
- Blood evidence collected in red solo cups that were placed in a Stop and Shop bag that was found in the Canton PD sally port right behind Karen Read's Lexus SUV. These blood droplets were discovered via use of a leaf blower.
- None of the first responders/law enforcement officers that morning saw red tail light pieces, John's other shoe or his hat that morning when the snowfall was the least it would be for days. Some of those tail light pieces later found were bigger than John's shoe.
- The Lexus' tail light was more or less whole on the morning of Jan 29, 2022 - there is a clear view of it on Ring footage from Officer John O'Keefe's house.
- Karen did not have access to any Ring footage from John's house.
- O'Keefe's cause of death was blunt force traume to the head and hypothermia. Manner of death was undetermined. The ME, Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello, confimed that his injuries were not consistent with a pedestrian vs car motor vehicle accident.
- His clothing had at least 2 unknown male's dna on them in addition to his own. Lead investigator Trooper Michael Proctor and his superviser, Trooper Yuri Bukhenik, were the only men swabbed for comparison.
- None of the 6 people who left after Karen dropped John off saw him laying on the lawn that night/morning, not even Lucky the plow driver who made a couple of passes at about 2:45 am. and again at about 3:30 am, where he had to go around a Ford Edge that appeared in the meantime. Whose car was it and if they saw John on the lawn why didn't they call 911? Nobody knows.
- Trooper Proctor determined Karen was the culprit on Jan 29 after having only interviewed 3 people who'd been at 34 Fairview. He interviewed two women who'd gone to Aruba with the couple before many of the rest of the folks who'd been at 34 Fairview that night.
- There are absolutely no evidence logs so no chain of custody for any of the physical evidence.
- The CW put a mirrored video of the sally port at Canton PD into evidence and tried to pretend it wasn't flipped.
- Half of the CW's witnesses had major phone issues from many butt dials, butt answers and butt hang ups, and finally, two destroyed phones.
- Two independent (ie not paid for by the defense and equally available to the prosecution) accident experts from ARRCA confirmed that John wasn't hit by a 7k lb SUV and Karen't car did not hit John.
Nobody seems to question the fact that law enforcement did an incredibly shoddy job in this investigation. Many understand that Proctor's tunnel vision/rush to judgement is also problematic. All 4 counts on the jury verdict forms have Karen hitting John with her SUV. So why is it so hard for the jury to come to a decision? Is it because the O'Keefe family brought Jen McCabe and Brian Albert as their guests to stare down the jury during closing arguments? And/or because John's brother, Paul, has stared daggers at Karen during the pendency of this trial? Did they doze off as ADA Adam Lally meandered his way through questioning during his case in chief? Do they ridiculously believe Trooper Joseph Paul's "reconstruction" of the alleged acciden, that had John pirouetting his way at least 6 feet into the lawn after somehow bouncing off the back of his head?
I'd also like to share a post I recently put on X:
The number of people on this platform that have completely shot their credibility because they fail to (or refuse to) understand what "reasonable doubt" entails is astounding to me. Amongst them are so-called "professionals," even lawyers, former LEOs; folks that purport to be involved in true crime and/or see themselves as victim advocates of some kind.
A majority of them seem to simply dislike a journalist whose handle is Turtle Boy and are either unwilling or unable to see the Karen Read trial with anything even approaching impartiality.
I do want to thank those that make it well known that their bias colors everything involved in this case because it's easy to find and mute them. Not because of any sort of "echo chamber," but because I know I cannot rely on anything they say.
I repost quite a bit that involves both current and cold cases and I need to know that those reporting are doing so from a place of authenticity. So, thanks again for making it easy for me to separate the wheat from the chaff.
If you like what I have to say consider following and/or tipping me – https://linktr.ee/BeingBel. Tips will go toward groceries and bills. I just want to contribute to our household at this time. Thanks so much!