SimplyBel
Writing
Lessons From my Mother
Kids are people, too!
February 13, 2025
post photo preview

When my son was 7 months old my mother had a massive stroke that almost killed her – she was only 59 and it just about shattered my world. She was my biggest cheerleader and my staunchest advocate. My son was her first grand-baby and she was in the room with me when I gave birth. She was his first babysitter and I called her just about daily with whatever was going on with him. We visited weekly after he was born and I remain profoundly grateful for that time together. All of this to say that after her stroke when we finally got her home, even with fairly profound aphasia she was able to give me some advise that has always shaped my life.

He's his own little person you know.

Growing up my mother never made me feel less than (unlike my father). She was always straight forward yet kept a bit of that "mom always knows" mysticism. She elegantly skated that fine line between honesty and keeping my baby sis and I sheltered from stuff we didn't need to know. For example, we were pretty poor when I was young but I had no clue that we were until years later. I guess I should've known just from the fact that we had a tiny black and white TV while my best friends family had a giant color TV but it was just how things were. She never complained and never put either of us girls in a bad spot between her and our father. When he went off she would only step in when he was being completely unfair, otherwise we knew she was on our side and would come to us after, which we were fine with. Without saying a word we just seemed to understand how our family dynamic worked. Us girls would just share glances with each other that my dad was completely oblivious to (or just ignored) that kept us more or less on an even keel.

Even though my father could be an emotionally abusive asshat, he certainly wasn't all bad. With a different woman, perhaps he would've been the sort of parent who thought their children were possessions. Not with my mother, though. Her core belief that children were their own people always shone through and it was lesson I never really needed to be told, it was a fact of our lives. And, again, I am profoundly grateful.

Many years later my sister in law (who was one of my best friends from 3rd period biology class on the first day of our freshman year in high school) would tell me the story of her mom calling mine in a quandary over some dress Ann (my now sis in law) wanted to wear to some shin dig the two of them were going to. Ann's mom was concerned the outfit was "too revealing," and my mom pointed out that Ann was an adult and could wear whatever she wanted. Rachel (Ann's mom) didn't like that answer. Ann had an enviable hour glass figure and was well endowed so, unless she wore a turtleneck muumuu, any dress would reveal something. In my mind I see an off the shoulder floral number with a full skirt so it's not like Ann wanted to wear a strapless micro-mini. My mother knew Ann quite well and treated her as she treated everybody - especially children - as their own people. I think she tried to impart that wisdom onto Rachel who begrudgingly accepted it and Ann did, indeed, wear that dress (and looked spectacular).

Growing up, my mother never interfered in our friendships. If she was iffy about a person she'd allow us to come to our own realizations and later say, "I never liked so-and-so," lol. And she trusted us to eventually come to these realizations in our own time. Aloud she informed us that she would always believe our teachers over us so we knew not to try to lie. However, when we were treated unfairly, she stood up for us. Yet another balancing act she seemed to pull off with ease although I now know that it wasn't really all that easy. But when you make the effort to get to know your children as people you understand them far better than they understand themselves and it give you keen insight into their psyches. Which you always hold with loving kindness because of the respect you've afforded them as their birthright.

After mom's stroke and our fight to get her home I was sitting with her as she sat up in bed with a breakfast tray on her lap. My 11 month old son toddled in, looked around, and toddled out. Mom pointed her spoon at me and said, clear as a bell, "he's his own person you know." I did know and that is how I have always treated him. Today he's a strapping 6 foot tall full grown man with a glorious head of hair, a keen mind and wit, and a gentle nature. He doesn't smoke (unlike my hubby and I), very rarely drinks and has never done a single drug. And absolutely none of this was my doing, I do not take credit – it's all him. However, I did raise him as his own person. I'm not nearly as good of a mother as my own was but I try.

The impetus for this article is because I just watched CLR Bruce Rivers video regarding the death of his son and my heart breaks. My own son will be 27 years old this year, the same age as Michael, and I cannot imagine how devastated Bruce is. Watching their interactions for the past few years reminds me of mine with my son so I get the feeling Bruce raised his son much as I raised mine (and how I was raised). He is not responsible for his son's choices and, for those who are less than gracious, you should know that none of us parents are. We do our best and also hope for the best when we send our children out into the world. We are there for our offspring, we help as much as we are allowed, we try to give them soft landing places. We do not dictate to them, we do not try to force them to do anything, we understand that our children are not possessions, they are people. We love them unconditionally, we're always proud and we keep our disappointment to ourselves unless it's a gentle learning lesson for their greater good.

community logo
Join the SimplyBel Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
August 18, 2023
Andy Signore is striking YT channels that shared his parody video

The cover is a still from the original video, the second is part of that parody that was created. Note that NEITHER show ANY nudity WHATSOEVER. He doesn't want the general public to know what a perverted scum bag he is. This week started off with a bang when he popped in Saggy Melonz live stream on Sat Aug 12. Andy Signore is triggered and running scared, IMO!

00:00:23
August 26, 2023
Chronicles of Andy Signore

Just storing this here since Andy Signore is striking google docs...

Chronicles_of_Andy_Signore_(3).pdf
Funerals are for the living.

Today is an odd day. It's been a decade/15 years since I lost my own parents and we didn't have traditional burial rights for either of them. It's been quite awhile since I took part in a Catholic funeral mass, which will be tomorrow for my father-in-law. Today is the interminable visitation although I highly doubt we'll be there for the entire 7 hours. Or at least, I hope not.

When I go, just cremate me and sprinkle me in the ocean to swim with dolphins. Or in Lake Superior just 'cuz I think it's cool. Have a party if you're so inclined and play some Pat Benatar, a little Enya, some Neil Diamond. Classic 70's rock and 80's pop. Maybe plant a tree.

Funerals are for the living even though we like to claim they're for the dead. Well, honoring the dead, anyway. The pomp and circumstance can be soothing to some, and others view it as an obligation. I fall in neither category and, more importantly, neither do my husband & son. However, these are the wishes of my step mother-in-law so we will...

November 05, 2024
Truth about Britt

Deleted post from Sept 2023

truth_about_britt_updated.pdf
post photo preview
The Many Faces of Lauren Matthias
When "true crime" becomes "true whine."

The social media streets are filled with ponderings regarding a certain 9 hour live-stream on YouTube (YT). Lauren Matthias, former local network reporter, now co-host of Hidden True Crime (HTC) (along with her husband, Dr. John Matthias) sat in front of a camera for 9 hours to tell everybody that would listen that she had a stalker and was afraid for her safety. What followed was not quite what I expected. It doesn't look like it's what many expected as she seems to have as many detractors as she does supporters. 

I'll admit, I was a "Hidden Gem" for a time, mostly for the Vallow Daybell trials. I dropped both my membership and subscription due to Lauren's takes regarding Richard Allen and his trial in Delphi, IN. Even Dr. John highly disappointed me, not seeing any problem at all with a presumed innocent pre-trial detainee being subjected to over a year in solitary confinement in the Indiana prison system (IDOC). Or him seemingly A-OK with a psych professional, Dr. Wala, being in every Facebook (FB) regarding the Delphi murders while treating this alleged murderer - is she just a true crime junkie or did she want to help insure his conviction?  Personally, I believe Rick Allen has been treated terribly and is factually innocent in the deaths of Abigail Williams & Liberty German.

Picking up bad habits from some friends that she made during that trial (mainly the co-hosts of Murder Sheet), Lauren copyright struck a number of smaller YT creators when they used her footage under Fair Use. In other words, they provided commentary (which was probably negative) regarding her reporting. I know at least one YouTuber settled things with her, one who also covered the Vallow Daybell trials, but the rest I'm unsure of.

To be fair, I did not listen to Lauren's whole 9 hour livestream. I've watched it piecemeal via other creators. I also listened to her court hearing and read some of documents Sleuthie Goosie posted on X. Mostly the affidavits of Christina (aka The Stalker) and three of her friends to see what the other side had to say. Lauren and her defenders claim they were followed a good half-dozen times but it seems Lauren and her crew purposely placed themselves in the vicinity. A few took place at/around CrimeCon 2025 - Christina had purchased a VIP pass a year prior which Lauren not only knew about, as they were friendly at the time, she had no plans to attend herself. Lauren had no booth, was not a speaker, etc. yet she showed up anyway and managed to prevent Christina from attending because she had a temporary restraining order (TRO) (or whatever the hell it's called in Utah/Nevada). Lauren also claims she was there "for work." What "work?"

A few other physical encounters that allegedly took place happened when Christina was out of the country. I guess the reason she was chosen as "The Stalker" is due to a bunch of harmless (and kinda inane IMO) Tik Tok videos. For 4 years, a rather large YT creator (he's approaching 1M subs, might have even surpassed it, but I very rarely watch him) and his co-creators/friends love to mention me and my friends, calling us things like crazy psycho mean girls that he will one day sue. Like Christina, he's careful not to mention our names. When we hit back, we endure ridicule and worse. That's just how social media works and Lauren is not exempt. She's also not being stalked, IMO.

As a matter of fact, that TRO will never become a permanent one. They held the first half of the hearing where the judge warned Lauren that she was trampling all over Christina's 1st amendment rights. Then we heard from a couple of witnesses on Christina's side. It was at the end of the day so they scheduled the remainder of the hearing for sometime in the future. Lauren's lawyer(s) subsequently asked for more time which the judge denied. In the end, Lauren dropped the matter although she's not told her followers that. Actually, reading the court docs, Lauren left out or twisted quite a bit of the story and made some ant hills into mountain ranges, IMO.

Bottom line: As Emily D. Baker says, "the internet is gonna internet." If you don't like what someone has to say then don't read/watch them. You can generally mute/block people on the various social media platforms. If you say shitty things in texts/DMs just know that eventually they're gonna get out. When it comes back to bite you in the ass it's best to swallow your pride and apologize rather than trying to villainize critics, IMO.

For a balanced perspective, I suggest watching Chasing's videos - she breaks everything down sensibly. I also highly recommend reading the court docs posted by Sleuthie Goosie.

Read full Article
August 20, 2025
post photo preview
Which are the Good Faith Actors?

While I was on my latest social media hiatus journalist Jess Machado posted her first interview on her new YouTube (YT) channel. Who did she choose as her subject? Notorious anti-free Karen Read (AFKR) figure, Kate Peter (KP) (or  "Krusty Panties" as fellow journalist Aidan Kearny has dubbed her). I have not watched the interview nor do I intend to - why would I subject myself to a known liar lying? Jess had to know that FKR would have feelings about this particular choice, that many of her "besties" would experience shock and disappointment. Unless KP came clean about her true reason for her AFKR stance and how it really was all about her hatred of Aidan. Dang it, now I just might hafta take a peek.

However, from what I'm seeing on X, it seems people are upset with Jess for publicly airing grievances with LTL media, a YT channel she appeared on weekly during the second trial of Karen Read. Particularly about a video that may or may not exist regarding the death of Mass. State Trooper trainee Enrique Delgado Garcia. This is a story that Brian of LTL has had his teeth sunk into since the end of last year, 2024. Garcia purportedly died of a brain aneurism during a training exercise although I'm wondering if that happened before or after his neck was broken (amongst other injuries). Hell of a coincidence, right?

Apparently, Brian gave Jess a glimpse of said video and claims she could've asked him to play it if she wanted to see the whole thing. Jess wonders why he hasn't shared it with the world. Brian has also said he does not actually possess it but has seen it. Logic dictates to me that Jess is the one telling the truth. And I think she's probably been pushing him to do something constructive with it. How much more could a paid guest do? Yes, that's the other thing that has stuck in the craw of many: Jess required payment to appear on Brian's show - an arrangement that both seemed comfortable with. This may well be standard in the TV industry but it strikes an odd chord with those of us who consume our news via social media.

Now I'm gonna rewind my way back to the reason for my hiatus - the downfall of someone we saw as a staunch supporter of Karen Read, Estey, and the rise of a pain in the ass named John Baron who seemed particularly aggrieved by another staunch FKR, Nan AKA Lawferio. I don't believe the two are connected, they just happened around the same time. It seems Estey just likes to sucker fish to large trials, her last one being another that is near and dear to my heart: Johnny Depp v Amber Heard (I'm JD all the way, BTW). As for John Baron, it turns out that it was an account shared by AFKR and FKR personalities. I have no idea why they picked on Nan. Jealousy and/or boredom are the only things that spring to mind. It's the height of stupidity to defame a successful lawyer, IMO.

Just for funsies, let's wrap all of this up and tie it with a ribbon called, "I was disappointed in Karen Read's party & other disgruntlements." LTL/Brian said he just sat back and observed the party because that's just how he is, now he's upset about not being included more. Or maybe it's more about not getting the recognition he thought he'd earned which is what Rita Lombardi's and Sean on the Gulf's complaints were about, too. Personally, what I do is because I feel it's right, not because I want kudos. I mean, they're nice, don't get me wrong, but they're not my reason d'etre. I'm about the same age as Rita & Sean - we're of an age that we're supposed to have some wisdom. Aparently that's about as rare as common sense.

In the end, I guess it comes down to what I'm willing to tolerate. I'm all for good fun but not when it comes at the expense of others. I guess I'm simply not up for schadenfreude.

Schadenfreude refers to the joy you might feel at another person’s pain. It’s a compound of the German nouns Schaden, meaning “damage,” and Freude, meaning “joy.”  Merriam-Webster

Read full Article
post photo preview
Jennifer Coffindaffer is Tired, Poor Thing!
The sham trial of Karen Read

Former (supposed) FBI agent Jennifer Coffindaffer says some ridiculous things on X regarding the Karen Read trial (amongst others). This one caught my eye yesterday:

Let's break it down:

The Top Ten Reasons why I can't Wait for the Karen Read trial to be over:

1-Tired of all the dissent in the True Crime Community. 

Most of those in the "True Crime Community" realize that, at the very least, the investigation was sorely lacking thus engendering feelings of a whole shit ton of reasonable doubt. People who truly believe Karen Read is guilty should be mad as hell at disgraced former trooper Michael Proctor yet they're not. I find this incredibly odd. It's almost like they agree with his whole "pin it on the girl" strategy.

2-Tired of trying to explain that there is 0 proof that an ATF Agent (who has his job and was not reprimanded in anyway much less accused of murder), a 30+ year Boston Police Officer (featured on Boston's Finest and retired with distinction about 2 years After the crime), a dog (sent to Vermont months after the crime due to a fight she had with another dog), and a minor (not even worth mentioning) Murdered John O'Keefe and brilliantly threw him in their front lawn.

So, stop trying to excuse ... er, explain stuff regarding people you don't even know. Higgins is on desk duty (last we heard, anyway), Brian Albert has a history of beating people up, a dog whose owners called the poor girl "it" and made her disappear the night of the incident only for her to reappear then end up being "rehomed," and a thug in the making. Btw, it's curious that you, of all people, knew where Chloe supposedly was when even the defense team didn't. The rest of us learned during her "mom" Nichole Albert's testimony well into trial #1. Another oddity, IMO.

3- Tired of listening to Alessi. 

I'm so sorry that Alessi is too smart and well spoken for some to understand. Personally, I'm tired of Hank Brennan's incessant whining. 

4- Tired of watching Karen Read's courtroom antics. 

No idea what you're talking about here. Do you mean her being an active and valued member of her own defense team?

5- Tired of reading all of the dribble from those who haven't watched the trial but pretend they have.

I think the word you're looking for is "drivel" and those who rebut you probably *have* watched the trial, you just don't like their viewpoints. Many also probably watched some, if not all, pretrial (especially for this second trial). I certainly have. The CW's own ME said Ofc O'Keefe's injuries were inconsistent with a motor vehicle strike. What are we even doing here?

6- Tired of the podcasters flushing truth for viewership.

Same girl, same but opposite. I'm tired of those that have flushed their integrity in order to push the CW's false narrative. However, I'm glad to weed out those who apparently lack critical thinking skills.

7- Tired of the Blogger's filthy mouth and lies. 

So don't watch/listen to him or read his articles. Easy fix, right?

8- Tired of Watching the Fan.

Agreed.

9- Tired of a simple Occam's Razor Domestic Violence case being made into a Cecil B. Deville drama fest.

I'm tired of people who think that cops running a crappy investigation is A-OK as long as whoever they deem to be the "bad guy" gets put away. I'm also tired of people shitting on our US Constitution and using the Bill of Rights to wipe their ass.

And number 10: Tired of watching a spoiled one continue to mock the death of a wonderful soul named John O'Keefe.

Nobody finds humor in the death of OFFICER John O'Keefe. Many see the tragedy in that some of his fellow brothers in blue didn't give him the honor he was due by conducting a proper investigation, exploring all avenues, in order to figure out what truly happened to him. Instead, he was just "a man," "the guy," and, ultimately, the victim. He's not even referred to as a Boston Police Officer in much of the CW's case. 

I will continue to advocate for justice in this case because it's the right thing to do.

Justice means not trampling over someone's rights. It means recognizing shoddy police work. It means not rushing to judgement. It means a thorough and proper investigation. It means not resorting to trickery in an attempt to secure a conviction. It means not ignoring inconvenient truths. 

This trial has brought to light how some DA's offices along with their local law enforcement sometimes works to railroad innocnt people. As attorney Mark Bederow likes to say, they're supposed to be the good guys. With Karen Read, we're seeing that's not always the case which is pretty eye opening, IMO. I have learned to take a closer look at how cases are investigated and garnered even more appreciation for the role of defense attorneys. Like many others, I've come to understand that the government does not generally have our best interest in mind. Sometimes they need their feet held to the fire. We can learn much from criminal defense attorneys Bob & Ali Motta (Defense Diaries), Andrea Burkhart (Andrea Burkhart), Ian Runkle (Runkle of the Bailey) and Natalie Whittingham Burrell (natalielawyerchick) as well as former prosecutor Emily D. Baker (The Emily Show). I would be remiss if I did not mention Attorney Melanie Little for complete covereage since pre-trial 1 and Peter Tragos (Lawyer You Know) for his unbiased and nuanced coverage. These are just a handful of lawyers on social media that are covering and/or commenting on this case. Those worth following point out the myriad of issues and just how much reasonable doubt there is.

FREE KAREN READ

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals